StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Search
  4. Search Engines
  5. CMS.js vs MkDocs

CMS.js vs MkDocs

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MkDocs
MkDocs
Stacks167
Followers152
Votes14
CMS.js
CMS.js
Stacks5
Followers38
Votes0

CMS.js vs MkDocs: What are the differences?

Introduction: In website development, choosing the right content management system (CMS) is crucial. This markdown will outline key differences between CMS.js and MkDocs, helping users make an informed decision.

  1. Design & Customization: CMS.js focuses on simplicity and ease of use, offering basic themes and limited customization options. MkDocs, on the other hand, has a more robust design and customization capabilities, allowing for greater control over the look and feel of the website.

  2. Content Management: CMS.js is primarily designed for managing and displaying static content, making it ideal for simple websites with minimal updates. MkDocs, however, is specifically tailored for creating and maintaining documentation-style websites, making it well-suited for projects requiring frequent content updates.

  3. Documentation Features: MkDocs is equipped with various features specifically tailored for documentation purposes, such as built-in search functionality, navigation menus, and organization tools. CMS.js lacks these specialized documentation features, making it less suitable for projects focused on creating informative and structured content.

  4. Community Support: MkDocs has an active and supportive community, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins to enhance the user experience. CMS.js, while functional, has a smaller community base, limiting the availability of resources and support for users.

  5. File Management: MkDocs uses markdown files for content creation, allowing for version control and collaboration using tools like Git. CMS.js, on the other hand, relies on a more traditional file structure, which may limit the scalability and collaboration potential for larger projects.

  6. Hosting & Deployment: MkDocs generates static HTML files that can be hosted on any web server with ease, making deployment straightforward. CMS.js requires a server environment with PHP support for its functionality, which may present limitations for some users.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between CMS.js and MkDocs, such as design customization, content management capabilities, documentation features, community support, file management, and hosting deployment, will aid users in selecting the most suitable CMS for their specific website needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

MkDocs
MkDocs
CMS.js
CMS.js

It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.

CMS.js is fully client-side, Javascript site generator in the spirit of Jekyll that uses plain ol' HTML, CSS and Javascript to generate your website. CMS.js is like a file-based CMS. It takes your content, renders Markdown and delivers a complete website in Single-Page App fashion...without the aid of server-side scripting (no Node.js, PHP, Ruby, etc.).

-
Can serve full GitHub repos as a site; Can serve files from an Apache server as a site
Statistics
Stacks
167
Stacks
5
Followers
152
Followers
38
Votes
14
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Speed
  • 4
    Gitlab integration
  • 3
    Extensibility
  • 2
    Themes
Cons
  • 1
    Build time increases exponentially as site grows
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to MkDocs, CMS.js?

Jekyll

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Hugo

Hugo

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

Gatsby

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Hexo

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Sphinx

Sphinx

It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.

Pelican

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Metalsmith

Metalsmith

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope