CodeKit vs Yarn

Overview

CodeKit

Stacks69

Followers103

Votes28

Yarn

Stacks28.2K

Followers13.5K

Votes151

GitHub Stars41.5K

Forks2.7K

CodeKit vs Yarn: What are the differences?

Installation Method: CodeKit is a macOS-only application that requires a one-time purchase for installation, whereas Yarn is a node package manager that can be installed across multiple operating systems using npm.
Supported Tools: CodeKit is a build tool that primarily focuses on frontend development, providing features like image optimization and Sass compilation, while Yarn is a package manager specifically designed for JavaScript projects.
Configuration Options: CodeKit simplifies configuration by offering a GUI interface to manage settings and project options, making it more user-friendly for beginners, unlike Yarn which relies on configuration files such as package.json for project settings.
Speed and Performance: Yarn generally outperforms CodeKit in terms of speed and performance due to its caching mechanisms and parallel package installations, making it a more efficient choice for larger projects with heavy dependencies.
Community Support: Yarn benefits from a larger open-source community and ecosystem, providing access to a wider range of packages and resources compared to CodeKit, which has a smaller, more focused user base.
Version Control: Yarn has better support for version control systems like Git, allowing for smoother integration with repositories and improved collaboration among developers, whereas CodeKit does not provide specific features tailored towards version control workflows.

In Summary, CodeKit and Yarn differ in installation methods, supported tools, configuration options, speed, community support, and version control integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CodeKit, Yarn

StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceon

Node.js

npm

Yarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k

Comments

zen-li

Apr 24, 2019

Reviewon

Yarn

p.s.

I am not sure about the performance of the latest version of npm, whether it is different from my understanding of it below. Because I use npm very rarely when I had the following knowledge.

------⏬

I use Yarn because, first, yarn is the first tool to lock the version. Second, although npm also supports the lock version, when you use npm to lock the version, and then use package-lock.json on other systems, package-lock.json Will be modified. You understand what I mean, when you deploy projects based on Git...

250k views250k

Comments

Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CodeKit	Yarn
Process Less, Sass, Stylus, Jade, Haml, Slim, CoffeeScript, Javascript, and Compass files automatically each time you save. Easily set options for each language.	Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.
Compile Everything - Less, Sass, Stylus, CoffeeScript, Typescript, Jade, Haml, Slim, Markdown & Javascript.;Auto-Refresh Browsers - Refresh browsers across devices: Mac, PC, iOS, Android & kitchen fridge. Never hit command+R again.;Bower Built-In - Install 6,000+ components with a single click: Bootstrap, jQuery, Modernizr, Zurb Foundation, even WordPress.;It Just Works - There's no grunting at a command line and zero setup. Just drop your project on the app and go.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 41.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.7K
Stacks 69	Stacks 28.2K
Followers 103	Followers 13.5K
Votes 28	Votes 151
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Instant setup for quick experiments 8 Easy to configure 7 Cross device live reloading 5 Any editor OK	Pros 85 Incredibly fast 22 Easy to use 13 Open Source 11 Can install any npm package 8 Works where npm fails Cons 16 Facebook 7 Sends data to facebook 4 Should be installed separately 3 Cannot publish to registry other than npm
Integrations
Bower Foundation Bourbon Compass	JavaScript npm

What are some alternatives to CodeKit, Yarn?

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Prepros

It is an interface tool which handles pre-processing, and other front-end tasks. Its greatest strength is the incredible ease with which it allows you to use pre-processors of various kinds, be they for CSS, HTML or JavaScript.

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

LiveReload

LiveReload monitors changes in the file system. As soon as you save a file, it is preprocessed as needed, and the browser is refreshed.

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Duo

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

Pika.dev

It is a new kind of package registry for the modern web. It handles formatting, configuring, building and publishing every package on the registry, so that individual authors don't have to.

Related Comparisons

CodeKit vs Yarn: What are the differences?

Installation Method: CodeKit is a macOS-only application that requires a one-time purchase for installation, whereas Yarn is a node package manager that can be installed across multiple operating systems using npm.
Supported Tools: CodeKit is a build tool that primarily focuses on frontend development, providing features like image optimization and Sass compilation, while Yarn is a package manager specifically designed for JavaScript projects.
Configuration Options: CodeKit simplifies configuration by offering a GUI interface to manage settings and project options, making it more user-friendly for beginners, unlike Yarn which relies on configuration files such as package.json for project settings.
Speed and Performance: Yarn generally outperforms CodeKit in terms of speed and performance due to its caching mechanisms and parallel package installations, making it a more efficient choice for larger projects with heavy dependencies.
Community Support: Yarn benefits from a larger open-source community and ecosystem, providing access to a wider range of packages and resources compared to CodeKit, which has a smaller, more focused user base.
Version Control: Yarn has better support for version control systems like Git, allowing for smoother integration with repositories and improved collaboration among developers, whereas CodeKit does not provide specific features tailored towards version control workflows.

In Summary, CodeKit and Yarn differ in installation methods, supported tools, configuration options, speed, community support, and version control integration.

CodeKit vs Yarn

Overview