CoreDNS vs Google Cloud DNS

Overview

Google Cloud DNS

Stacks2.4K

Followers572

Votes44

CoreDNS

Stacks48

Followers68

Votes5

GitHub Stars13.5K

Forks2.3K

CoreDNS vs Google Cloud DNS: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In comparing CoreDNS and Google Cloud DNS, it is important to understand the key differences between these two popular DNS solutions.

Architecture: CoreDNS is a flexible, extensible DNS server that can be easily configured through plugins, allowing users to customize its functionality to suit their specific needs. On the other hand, Google Cloud DNS is a managed DNS service provided by Google Cloud Platform, offering users a scalable and reliable DNS infrastructure without the need for manual configuration or maintenance.
Integration with Services: CoreDNS can be integrated with various cloud platforms, container environments, and orchestrators, making it a versatile option for organizations with diverse IT infrastructures. In contrast, Google Cloud DNS is tightly integrated with other Google Cloud services, providing seamless connectivity and management within the Google Cloud ecosystem.
Scalability and Performance: CoreDNS is known for its lightweight and efficient design, making it well-suited for high-performance environments where low latency and high throughput are critical. Google Cloud DNS, on the other hand, offers a highly scalable and globally distributed infrastructure, ensuring fast and reliable DNS resolution for users worldwide.
Security Features: CoreDNS provides several security features, such as DNSSEC support, query logging, and IP-based access control, allowing users to secure their DNS infrastructure against various threats and attacks. Google Cloud DNS also offers robust security measures, including DDoS protection, network encryption, and identity and access management (IAM) integration for secure access control.
Cost and Pricing Model: CoreDNS is an open-source project that is free to use and can be deployed on any infrastructure, making it a cost-effective option for organizations looking to manage their own DNS servers. In contrast, Google Cloud DNS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on their usage of the service, making it a convenient option for businesses looking for a managed DNS solution with predictable costs.

In Summary, understanding the architecture, integration capabilities, scalability, security features, and pricing models of CoreDNS and Google Cloud DNS can help organizations make informed decisions when choosing a DNS solution for their infrastructure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Google Cloud DNS, CoreDNS

Eric

Service Engineer at Zix Corporation

Aug 5, 2020

Needs adviceon

Amazon Route 53

We are looking for advice / best-practices / caveats about migrating off BIND on to Unbound https://nlnetlabs.nl/projects/unbound/about/ for internal & external (customer-facing) DNS. Is unbound suitable for this, or is it only recommended for caching? How easy or difficult is it to move 10000's of existing BIND DNS zone entries? We already use Amazon Route 53 for our AWS instances and Cloud DNS for our GCP ones, but would like to maintain internal DNS for cost, control, and latency reasons.

58.6k views58.6k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Google Cloud DNS	CoreDNS
Use Google's infrastructure for production quality, high volume DNS serving. Your users will have reliable, low-latency access to Google's infrastructure from anywhere in the world using our network of Anycast name servers.	CoreDNS is a DNS server. It is written in Go. It can be used in a multitude of environments because of its flexibility
High performance, reliable DNS service;Easy to use, customizable to your needs;Manage records for all your services	Plugins; Service Discovery; Fast and Flexible
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 13.5K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.3K
Stacks 2.4K	Stacks 48
Followers 572	Followers 68
Votes 44	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
Pros 9 Backed by Google 7 High-availability 6 Reliable 5 Anycast DNS servers 5 High volume Cons 4 Lack of privacy 2 Backed by Google	Pros 3 Kubernetes Integration 2 Open Soure

What are some alternatives to Google Cloud DNS, CoreDNS?

Amazon Route 53

Amazon Route 53 is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating human readable names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Route 53 effectively connects user requests to infrastructure running in Amazon Web Services (AWS) – such as an Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) instance, an Amazon Elastic Load Balancer, or an Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) bucket – and can also be used to route users to infrastructure outside of AWS.

DNSimple

DNSimple provides the tools you need to manage your domains. We offer both a carefully crafted web interface for managing your domains and DNS records, as well as an HTTP API with various code libraries and tools. Buy, connect, operate!

Dyn

An all-in-one Managed DNS service for your registered domain names. Dyn DNS is the perfect solution for your domain name’s DNS needs, whether it is for personal or business use. It gives you complete control over your DNS zone and its associated DNS records, complete with a simple DNS management web interface.

DNS Made Easy

DNS Made Easy is a subsidiary of Tiggee LLC, and is a world leader in providing global IP Anycast enterprise DNS services. DNS Made Easy is currently ranked the fastest provider for 8 consecutive months and the most reliable provider.

NS1

NS1’s intelligent DNS & traffic management platform, with its data driven architecture and unique Filter Chain routing engine, is purpose-built for the most demanding, mission-critical applications on the Internet.

nextdns

Cloud-based private DNS service that gives you full control over what is allowed and what is blocked on the Internet. Think of it as a combination of Cloudflare DNS and Pi-hole®.

InboxKit

InboxKit automates your entire cold email infrastructure. Buy domains, provision Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 mailboxes, configure DNS, and export to 16+ sequencers — all from one dashboard. Scale from 10 to 10,000 mailboxes without the manual setup headache.

Modern DDoS Protection & Edge Security Platform

Protect and accelerate your apps with Trafficmind’s global edge — DDoS defense, WAF, API security, CDN/DNS, 99.99% uptime and 24/7 expert team.

BIND9

It is a versatile name server software. It has evolved to be a very flexible, full-featured DNS system. Whatever your application is, it probably has the required features.

PowerDNS

It features a large number of different backends ranging from simple BIND style zonefiles to relational databases and load balancing/failover algorithms. A DNS recursor is provided as a separate program.

Related Comparisons

CoreDNS vs Google Cloud DNS: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In comparing CoreDNS and Google Cloud DNS, it is important to understand the key differences between these two popular DNS solutions.

Architecture: CoreDNS is a flexible, extensible DNS server that can be easily configured through plugins, allowing users to customize its functionality to suit their specific needs. On the other hand, Google Cloud DNS is a managed DNS service provided by Google Cloud Platform, offering users a scalable and reliable DNS infrastructure without the need for manual configuration or maintenance.
Integration with Services: CoreDNS can be integrated with various cloud platforms, container environments, and orchestrators, making it a versatile option for organizations with diverse IT infrastructures. In contrast, Google Cloud DNS is tightly integrated with other Google Cloud services, providing seamless connectivity and management within the Google Cloud ecosystem.
Scalability and Performance: CoreDNS is known for its lightweight and efficient design, making it well-suited for high-performance environments where low latency and high throughput are critical. Google Cloud DNS, on the other hand, offers a highly scalable and globally distributed infrastructure, ensuring fast and reliable DNS resolution for users worldwide.
Security Features: CoreDNS provides several security features, such as DNSSEC support, query logging, and IP-based access control, allowing users to secure their DNS infrastructure against various threats and attacks. Google Cloud DNS also offers robust security measures, including DDoS protection, network encryption, and identity and access management (IAM) integration for secure access control.
Cost and Pricing Model: CoreDNS is an open-source project that is free to use and can be deployed on any infrastructure, making it a cost-effective option for organizations looking to manage their own DNS servers. In contrast, Google Cloud DNS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on their usage of the service, making it a convenient option for businesses looking for a managed DNS solution with predictable costs.

CoreDNS vs Google Cloud DNS

Overview