Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Cowboy vs lighttpd vs nginx: What are the differences?
# Key Differences Between Cowboy, lighttpd, and nginx
<In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Cowboy, lighttpd, and nginx to help you choose the best web server for your specific needs.>
1. **Performance**:
Cowboy is known for its high performance and ability to handle a large number of simultaneous connections efficiently. lighttpd is also performant but may not match Cowboy's capabilities in terms of raw speed. nginx, on the other hand, is designed to excel in performance and is often touted as one of the fastest web servers available.
2. **Configuration**:
Cowboy provides a simple and straightforward configuration, making it easy to set up and manage. lighttpd also offers a user-friendly configuration but may require more tweaking for advanced settings. nginx is praised for its flexible and powerful configuration options, allowing for fine-tuning to optimize performance and security.
3. **Features**:
Cowboy is a lightweight web server that focuses on simplicity and speed, offering minimal features out of the box. lighttpd, while also lightweight, includes more advanced features such as FastCGI, SCGI, and CGI support. nginx is feature-rich, providing capabilities for load balancing, reverse proxying, caching, and more.
4. **Scalability**:
Cowboy is efficient in handling a large number of simultaneous connections, making it suitable for high-traffic applications. lighttpd is also scalable but may require additional configuration for optimal performance under heavy loads. nginx is widely recognized for its scalability and is commonly used in large-scale deployments to handle high volumes of traffic.
5. **Community Support**:
Cowboy has a smaller but dedicated community that actively maintains and supports the web server. lighttpd has a strong community backing with regular updates and documentation. nginx boasts a large and active user base, extensive documentation, and frequent updates, making it a popular choice for many developers and system administrators.
6. **Use Cases**:
Cowboy is ideal for simple web applications or APIs that require fast response times and minimal overhead. lighttpd is well-suited for serving static content or as a backend web server in complex setups. nginx is versatile and can be used in a variety of scenarios, including as a reverse proxy, load balancer, or standalone web server.
In Summary, when choosing between Cowboy, lighttpd, and nginx, consider factors such as performance, configuration flexibility, features, scalability, community support, and specific use cases to find the best fit for your web server needs.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.
We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.
We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.
- Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
- The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
- The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
- PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
Pros of Cowboy
- Websockets integration8
- Cool name6
- Good to use with Erlang3
- Anime mascot2
Pros of lighttpd
- Lightweight7
- Easy setup6
- Simplicity2
- Full featured2
- Proxy2
- Virtal hosting2
- Open source2
- Available modules1
- Fast1
- Security1
- Ssl support1
Pros of NGINX
- High-performance http server1.4K
- Performance893
- Easy to configure730
- Open source607
- Load balancer530
- Free288
- Scalability288
- Web server225
- Simplicity175
- Easy setup136
- Content caching30
- Web Accelerator21
- Capability15
- Fast14
- High-latency12
- Predictability12
- Reverse Proxy8
- The best of them7
- Supports http/27
- Great Community5
- Lots of Modules5
- Enterprise version5
- High perfomance proxy server4
- Reversy Proxy3
- Streaming media delivery3
- Streaming media3
- Embedded Lua scripting3
- GRPC-Web2
- Blash2
- Lightweight2
- Fast and easy to set up2
- Slim2
- saltstack2
- Virtual hosting1
- Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast1
- Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior1
- Ingress controller1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Cowboy
Cons of lighttpd
Cons of NGINX
- Advanced features require subscription10
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Cowboy?
What is lighttpd?
What is NGINX?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Cowboy?
What companies use lighttpd?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Cowboy?
What tools integrate with lighttpd?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+12
+17
+22
+31+46+15
+6+9