StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Cowboy vs Microsoft IIS

Apache Tomcat vs Cowboy vs Microsoft IIS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes238
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K
Cowboy
Cowboy
Stacks711
Followers72
Votes19
GitHub Stars7.4K
Forks1.2K

Apache Tomcat vs Cowboy vs Microsoft IIS: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this analysis, we will explore the key differences between Apache Tomcat, Cowboy, and Microsoft IIS, three popular web servers with distinct features and functionalities.

  1. Deployment flexibility: Apache Tomcat is a Java-based web server that primarily focuses on serving Java web applications, making it a popular choice for hosting Java-based websites or applications. In contrast, Cowboy is an open-source web server that specializes in handling high-performance, low-latency tasks, often used in real-time web applications. Microsoft IIS, on the other hand, is a Windows-based web server that integrates seamlessly with Microsoft technologies, making it an attractive option for organizations entrenched in the Microsoft ecosystem.

  2. Operating system compatibility: Apache Tomcat is compatible with various operating systems such as Windows, Linux, and macOS, providing flexibility in deployment options. Cowboy, designed in Erlang, is known for its reliability and fault-tolerance, making it a suitable choice for distributed systems and concurrent applications. Microsoft IIS, being a Windows-specific web server, is optimized for Windows Server operating systems, offering robust integration with other Microsoft products.

  3. Scalability and performance: Apache Tomcat, with its clustering features and scalability options, can handle a high volume of traffic efficiently, making it suitable for applications with varying loads. Cowboy, optimized for performance and speed, excels in handling thousands of concurrent connections, a critical requirement for real-time applications. Microsoft IIS, with its advanced performance tuning capabilities and integration with the Windows platform, delivers high performance for Windows-based applications.

  4. Community support and documentation: Apache Tomcat, being an open-source project maintained by the Apache Software Foundation, has a large and active community that contributes to its development and offers comprehensive documentation and support resources. Cowboy, with its Erlang programming language roots, benefits from a niche community that values its fault-tolerance and scalability features. Microsoft IIS, backed by Microsoft's extensive support network and documentation, provides robust support for users within the Windows ecosystem.

  5. Security features: Apache Tomcat offers secure connections through SSL/TLS protocols, role-based access control, and various authentication mechanisms, ensuring robust security for web applications. Cowboy, known for its lightweight design and efficient handling of requests, prioritizes security by leveraging Erlang's fault-tolerant features and secure coding practices. Microsoft IIS, with its integration with Windows Server security features, offers advanced security options such as IP and domain restrictions, request filtering, and enhanced logging capabilities.

  6. Cost considerations: Apache Tomcat, as an open-source solution, is free to use, making it a cost-effective option for organizations looking for a Java-based web server. Cowboy, being open-source as well, offers a cost-effective solution for real-time web applications that require high performance. Microsoft IIS, although requiring licensing fees for Windows Server deployments, provides value through its integration with Microsoft technologies and comprehensive support offerings.

In Summary, Apache Tomcat, Cowboy, and Microsoft IIS each bring unique strengths in deployment flexibility, operating system compatibility, scalability, performance, community support, security features, and cost considerations, catering to diverse needs and preferences in the realm of web server technologies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Cowboy
Cowboy

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Cowboy aims to provide a complete HTTP stack in a small code base. It is optimized for low latency and low memory usage, in part because it uses binary strings. Cowboy provides routing capabilities, selectively dispatching requests to handlers written in Erlang.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
7.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
15.5K
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
711
Followers
7.7K
Followers
12.6K
Followers
72
Votes
238
Votes
201
Votes
19
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
Pros
  • 8
    Websockets integration
  • 6
    Cool name
  • 3
    Good to use with Erlang
  • 2
    Anime mascot

What are some alternatives to Microsoft IIS, Apache Tomcat, Cowboy?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Caddy

Caddy

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase