StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. CrateIO vs QuestDB

CrateIO vs QuestDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CrateIO
CrateIO
Stacks19
Followers39
Votes7
GitHub Stars4.3K
Forks581
QuestDB
QuestDB
Stacks19
Followers50
Votes17
GitHub Stars16.3K
Forks1.5K

CrateIO vs QuestDB: What are the differences?

CrateIO and QuestDB are both popular database management systems known for their efficiency and performance. However, they have distinct differences that cater to different use cases and requirements.
  1. Data Models: CrateIO utilizes a schema-based data model, allowing users to define the structure of their data beforehand. On the other hand, QuestDB follows a schema-less approach, enabling users to store data without predefining the structure. This provides flexibility in data ingestion and storage in QuestDB compared to CrateIO's more rigid schema-based model.

  2. Query Language: CrateIO supports SQL as its primary query language, making it easier for users familiar with SQL syntax to interact with the database. In contrast, QuestDB uses a specialized query language optimized for time-series data handling, offering specific functions and optimizations tailored to this use case. This results in more efficient query execution and processing in QuestDB for time-series data.

  3. Performance and Scalability: While both databases are designed for high performance, QuestDB excels in handling large volumes of time-series data with its specialized architecture and query optimization techniques. CrateIO, on the other hand, provides better scalability options for diverse workloads and larger datasets due to its distributed nature and sharding capabilities.

  4. Community Support and Ecosystem: QuestDB has a growing community and ecosystem focused on time-series data applications, with active development and support for relevant libraries and tools. In comparison, CrateIO has a more established community with a broader focus on various data management use cases, providing a different range of integrations and support resources.

  5. Storage Engine: CrateIO uses custom-built storage engines optimized for distributed data processing and efficient data retrieval. In contrast, QuestDB leverages its specialized hybrid storage engine combining columnar and row-based storage to achieve high performance and low latency for time-series data operations.

  6. Use Cases: CrateIO is well-suited for general-purpose data management, handling structured and unstructured data efficiently in a distributed environment. QuestDB, on the other hand, is specifically tailored for time-series data applications, offering optimized storage, querying, and processing capabilities for this use case. In Summary, CrateIO and QuestDB differ significantly in their data models, query languages, performance, community support, storage engines, and use cases, catering to distinct needs in the database management landscape.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CrateIO
CrateIO
QuestDB
QuestDB

Crate is a distributed data store. Simply install Crate directly on your application servers and make the big centralized database a thing of the past. Crate takes care of synchronization, sharding, scaling, and replication even for mammoth data sets.

QuestDB is an open source database for time series, events, and analytical workloads with a primary focus on performance. It enhances ANSI SQL with time series extensions.

Familiar SQL syntax;Semi-structured data;High availability, resiliency, and scalability in a distributed design;Powerful Lucene based full-text search
Relational model for time series; SIMD accelerated queries; Time partitioned; Heavy parallelization; Scalable ingestion; Immediate consistency; Time series and relational joins; Native InfluxDB line protocol; Grafana through Postgres wire support; Schema or schema-free; Aggregations and down sampling
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.3K
GitHub Stars
16.3K
GitHub Forks
581
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
19
Stacks
19
Followers
39
Followers
50
Votes
7
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Simplicity
  • 2
    Scale
  • 2
    Open source
Pros
  • 2
    Time-series data analysis
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Real-time analytics
  • 2
    SQL
  • 2
    Postgres wire protocol
Integrations
Docker
Docker
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Java
Java
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to CrateIO, QuestDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase