StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. CUBA Platform vs Play

CUBA Platform vs Play

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Play
Play
Stacks752
Followers609
Votes496
GitHub Stars12.6K
Forks4.1K
CUBA Platform
CUBA Platform
Stacks10
Followers23
Votes3
GitHub Stars1.3K
Forks216

CUBA Platform vs Play: What are the differences?

# Introduction
CUBA Platform and Play are both popular frameworks used in web development, but they have key differences that set them apart.

1. **Architecture**: CUBA Platform follows a full-stack architecture, providing a structured approach to building enterprise applications with ready-to-use components, security features, and easy integration. In contrast, Play framework is a lightweight, stateless model-view-controller (MVC) architecture that focuses on simplicity, performance, and minimal overhead.

2. **Language Support**: CUBA Platform is built using Java, which is a preferred language for enterprise development due to its scalability and robustness. On the other hand, Play framework supports multiple languages such as Java, Scala, and Groovy, allowing developers to choose based on their expertise and project requirements.

3. **Data Layer**: CUBA Platform offers built-in support for ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tools like JPA (Java Persistence API) for database interaction and management. In contrast, Play framework provides flexibility in choosing ORM tools like Ebean or Slick for handling database operations, depending on the developer's preference.

4. **UI Component Library**: CUBA Platform comes with a rich set of UI components, themes, and templates for creating visually appealing and user-friendly interfaces, making it suitable for rapid application prototyping and development. Play framework, on the other hand, focuses on minimalistic design and allows developers to customize the UI components to meet specific design requirements.

5. **Community and Ecosystem**: CUBA Platform has a dedicated community and marketplace where developers can access plugins, add-ons, and support resources to enhance their development experience and speed up project delivery. Play framework, while also having an active community, promotes a more lightweight and modular approach, encouraging developers to build applications with custom components and libraries.

6. **Deployment and Scalability**: CUBA Platform provides built-in support for deploying applications on various servers and cloud platforms, making it ideal for scalable enterprise applications that require high availability and performance. In contrast, Play framework offers flexibility in deployment options and scalability by leveraging lightweight containers like Docker and Kubernetes to manage application resources efficiently.

In Summary, CUBA Platform offers a comprehensive full-stack development experience with Java support, pre-built components, and enterprise features, while Play framework provides a lightweight, flexible MVC architecture with support for multiple languages and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Play
Play
CUBA Platform
CUBA Platform

Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

It is a high-level open-source Java web framework for the rapid development of enterprise applications. The platform abstracts developers from underlying technologies so they can focus on the business tasks, whilst retaining full flexibility by providing unrestricted access to low-level code. Applications are developed in Java, with the user interface declared in XML. A rich set of features covers most typical project requirements and development tools reduce boilerplate code and facilitate truly rapid development.

-
Generic user interface; Multiple data stores; User management; Data access control; Full audit of user actions; Dynamic attributes; File storage; Admin tools; Scheduled tasks; Generic REST API; Single sign-on
Statistics
GitHub Stars
12.6K
GitHub Stars
1.3K
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
216
Stacks
752
Stacks
10
Followers
609
Followers
23
Votes
496
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 81
    Scala
  • 55
    Web-friendly architecture
  • 55
    Built on akka
  • 50
    Stateless
  • 47
    High-scalable
Cons
  • 3
    Evolves fast, keep up with releases
  • 1
    Unnecessarily complicated
Pros
  • 1
    Component based
  • 1
    Java
  • 1
    Lots out of the box

What are some alternatives to Play, CUBA Platform?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase