CUBA Platform vs Spring Framework

Overview

Spring Framework

Stacks6.5K

Followers886

Votes0

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

CUBA Platform

Stacks10

Followers23

Votes3

GitHub Stars1.3K

Forks216

CUBA Platform vs Spring Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction:

CUBA Platform and Spring Framework are two popular Java-based web application development frameworks that offer a range of features to developers. Here are the key differences between the two frameworks:

Architecture: CUBA Platform provides a high-level application framework combined with productivity tools, and a visual development environment that accelerates the development process. In contrast, Spring Framework focuses on providing a lightweight, flexible framework for building enterprise-level applications with a focus on dependency injection, aspect-oriented programming, and transaction management.
Data Access: CUBA Platform includes its own ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tool called CUBA Entities, which simplifies database interaction and enables rapid application development. On the other hand, Spring Framework seamlessly integrates with popular ORM tools like Hibernate and JPA, allowing developers to choose the best tool for their specific requirements.
User Interface: CUBA Platform offers a range of visual development tools and UI components that enable developers to create responsive and visually appealing user interfaces without writing extensive code. In contrast, Spring Framework does not provide built-in UI components but can be easily integrated with front-end frameworks like Angular, React, or Thymeleaf for creating user interfaces.
Security: CUBA Platform includes a comprehensive security subsystem that allows developers to easily configure role-based access control, data-level security, and authentication mechanisms for applications. In comparison, Spring Security, an extension of the Spring Framework, provides a robust and customizable security framework for authentication, authorization, and protection against common security threats.
Integration: CUBA Platform offers built-in support for RESTful APIs, integration with third-party services, and the ability to create service-oriented architectures with ease. Spring Framework, on the other hand, provides extensive integration capabilities through its support for various protocols and standards like JMS, JDBC, JPA, and web services.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring Framework has a large and active community of developers, contributors, and third-party libraries that enhance its functionality and provide solutions to common development challenges. CUBA Platform, while growing in popularity, has a smaller community but offers dedicated support and resources for developers using the platform.

In Summary, CUBA Platform and Spring Framework differ in their architecture, data access, user interface capabilities, security features, integration options, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spring Framework, CUBA Platform

juan9222

Jul 25, 2020

Needs advice

Hi there, I'm deciding the technology to use in my project.

I need to build software that has:

Login
Register
Main View (access to a user account, News, General Info, Business hours, software, and parts section).
Account Preferences.
Web Shop for Parts (Support, Download Sections, Ticket System).

The most critical functionality is a WebSocket that connects between a car that sends real-time data through serial communication, and a server performs diagnosis on the car and sends the results back to the user.

616k views616k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Framework	CUBA Platform
It provides a comprehensive programming and configuration model for modern Java-based enterprise applications - on any kind of deployment platform. The framework's core features can be used by any Java application, but there are extensions for building web applications on top of the Java EE platform.	It is a high-level open-source Java web framework for the rapid development of enterprise applications. The platform abstracts developers from underlying technologies so they can focus on the business tasks, whilst retaining full flexibility by providing unrestricted access to low-level code. Applications are developed in Java, with the user interface declared in XML. A rich set of features covers most typical project requirements and development tools reduce boilerplate code and facilitate truly rapid development.
Lightweight; Dependency Injection; Transaction Management	Generic user interface; Multiple data stores; User management; Data access control; Full audit of user actions; Dynamic attributes; File storage; Admin tools; Scheduled tasks; Generic REST API; Single sign-on
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.1K	GitHub Stars 1.3K
GitHub Forks 38.8K	GitHub Forks 216
Stacks 6.5K	Stacks 10
Followers 886	Followers 23
Votes 0	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 1 Component based 1 Java 1 Lots out of the box
Integrations
AngularJS MySQL NetBeans IDE Hibernate IntelliJ IDEA	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Spring Framework, CUBA Platform?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

CUBA Platform vs Spring Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Architecture: CUBA Platform provides a high-level application framework combined with productivity tools, and a visual development environment that accelerates the development process. In contrast, Spring Framework focuses on providing a lightweight, flexible framework for building enterprise-level applications with a focus on dependency injection, aspect-oriented programming, and transaction management.
Data Access: CUBA Platform includes its own ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) tool called CUBA Entities, which simplifies database interaction and enables rapid application development. On the other hand, Spring Framework seamlessly integrates with popular ORM tools like Hibernate and JPA, allowing developers to choose the best tool for their specific requirements.
User Interface: CUBA Platform offers a range of visual development tools and UI components that enable developers to create responsive and visually appealing user interfaces without writing extensive code. In contrast, Spring Framework does not provide built-in UI components but can be easily integrated with front-end frameworks like Angular, React, or Thymeleaf for creating user interfaces.
Security: CUBA Platform includes a comprehensive security subsystem that allows developers to easily configure role-based access control, data-level security, and authentication mechanisms for applications. In comparison, Spring Security, an extension of the Spring Framework, provides a robust and customizable security framework for authentication, authorization, and protection against common security threats.
Integration: CUBA Platform offers built-in support for RESTful APIs, integration with third-party services, and the ability to create service-oriented architectures with ease. Spring Framework, on the other hand, provides extensive integration capabilities through its support for various protocols and standards like JMS, JDBC, JPA, and web services.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring Framework has a large and active community of developers, contributors, and third-party libraries that enhance its functionality and provide solutions to common development challenges. CUBA Platform, while growing in popularity, has a smaller community but offers dedicated support and resources for developers using the platform.

In Summary, CUBA Platform and Spring Framework differ in their architecture, data access, user interface capabilities, security features, integration options, and community support.

CUBA Platform vs Spring Framework

Overview