StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Charting Libraries
  5. D3.js vs Vue.js

D3.js vs Vue.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

D3.js
D3.js
Stacks2.0K
Followers1.7K
Votes653
GitHub Stars111.7K
Forks22.9K
Vue.js
Vue.js
Stacks55.5K
Followers44.7K
Votes1.6K
GitHub Stars209.7K
Forks33.8K

D3.js vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

D3.js and Vue.js are both popular JavaScript frameworks, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features. This Markdown code provides a comparison between D3.js and Vue.js, highlighting their key differences.

  1. Data Visualization: D3.js is primarily a data visualization library that allows developers to create interactive and dynamic charts, graphs, and other visualizations. It provides a low-level approach, enabling fine-grained control over the rendering process. On the other hand, Vue.js is a progressive framework for building user interfaces and is not specifically designed for data visualization. It focuses on managing the application state and efficiently updating the DOM.

  2. Component-based Architecture: Vue.js follows a component-based architecture, where the application is built using reusable and modular components. This approach promotes code reusability and maintainability. In contrast, D3.js does not have a built-in component system and instead relies on a more procedural approach, where developers directly manipulate the DOM to create visualizations. This can make code organization and component reuse less straightforward.

  3. Reactivity: Vue.js offers a reactivity system, which means that when data changes, the user interface automatically updates to reflect those changes. This behavior is achieved through the use of declarative rendering and a virtual DOM. D3.js, on the other hand, does not provide built-in reactivity. Developers need to explicitly handle data changes and update the visualizations accordingly.

  4. Learning Curve: Vue.js has a relatively gentle learning curve, especially for developers already familiar with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. It provides clear and concise documentation, a rich ecosystem of plugins, and a straightforward API that simplifies development. D3.js, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve due to its low-level nature and the need to understand concepts like SVG, data binding, and DOM manipulation. Mastery of D3.js often requires a deeper understanding of JavaScript and data visualization concepts.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Vue.js has a large and active community, with numerous resources, tutorials, and plugins available. It benefits from being backed by a company (Vue.js Core Team) and has gained wide popularity in the web development community. D3.js also has an active community but is more specialized in the data visualization domain. It is widely used by data scientists, journalists, and designers for creating intricate and custom visualizations.

  6. Scope and Use Cases: Due to its data-centric focus, D3.js is particularly well-suited for complex and custom data visualizations. It provides complete control over the rendering process, enabling developers to create highly interactive and visually appealing visualizations. Vue.js, on the other hand, excels at building user interfaces and interactive applications in a more general sense. It is commonly used in developing single-page applications, dashboards, and UI-heavy projects.

In summary, the key differences between D3.js and Vue.js include their primary focus (data visualization vs. UI development), architectural approach (low-level vs. component-based), reactivity system, learning curve, community support, and scope/use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on D3.js, Vue.js

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Simon
Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 22, 2020

DecidedonVuetifyVuetifyVue.jsVue.jsNuxt.jsNuxt.js

Our whole Vue.js frontend stack (incl. SSR) consists of the following tools:

  • @{Nuxt.js}|tool:7304| consisting of @{Vue CLI}|tool:9559|, @{Vue Router}|tool:6932|, @{vuex}|tool:6705|, @{Webpack}|tool:1682| and @{Sass}|tool:1171| (Bundler for @{HTML5}|tool:2538|, @{CSS 3}|tool:6727|), @{Babel}|tool:2739| (Transpiler for @{JavaScript}|tool:1209|),
  • Vue Styleguidist as our style guide and pool of developed @{Vue.js}|tool:3837| components
  • @{Vuetify}|tool:6163| as Material Component Framework (for fast app development)
  • @{TypeScript}|tool:1612| as programming language
  • @{Apollo}|tool:5508| / @{GraphQL}|tool:3820| (incl. @{GraphiQL}|tool:7879|) for data access layer (https://apollo.vuejs.org/)
  • @{ESLint}|tool:3337|, @{TSLint}|tool:5561| and @{Prettier}|tool:7035| for coding style and code analyzes
  • @{Jest}|tool:830| as testing framework
  • @{Google Fonts}|tool:2652| and @{Font Awesome}|tool:3244| for typography and icon toolkit
  • @{NativeScript-Vue}|tool:9623| for mobile development

The main reason we have chosen Vue.js over React and AngularJS is related to the following artifacts:

  • Empowered HTML. Vue.js has many similar approaches with Angular. This helps to optimize HTML blocks handling with the use of different components.
  • Detailed documentation. Vue.js has very good documentation which can fasten learning curve for developers.
  • Adaptability. It provides a rapid switching period from other frameworks. It has similarities with Angular and React in terms of design and architecture.
  • Awesome integration. Vue.js can be used for both building single-page applications and more difficult web interfaces of apps. Smaller interactive parts can be easily integrated into the existing infrastructure with no negative effect on the entire system.
  • Large scaling. Vue.js can help to develop pretty large reusable templates.
  • Tiny size. Vue.js weights around 20KB keeping its speed and flexibility. It allows reaching much better performance in comparison to other frameworks.
5.13M views5.13M
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

D3.js
D3.js
Vue.js
Vue.js

It is a JavaScript library for manipulating documents based on data. Emphasises on web standards gives you the full capabilities of modern browsers without tying yourself to a proprietary framework.

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Declarative Approach for Individual Nodes Manipulation; Functions Factory; Web Standards; Built-in ELement Inspector to Debug; Uses SVG, Canvas, and HTML; Data-driven approach to DOM Manipulation; Voronoi Diagrams; Maps and topo.
Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
Statistics
GitHub Stars
111.7K
GitHub Stars
209.7K
GitHub Forks
22.9K
GitHub Forks
33.8K
Stacks
2.0K
Stacks
55.5K
Followers
1.7K
Followers
44.7K
Votes
653
Votes
1.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 195
    Beautiful visualizations
  • 103
    Svg
  • 92
    Data-driven
  • 81
    Large set of examples
  • 61
    Data-driven documents
Cons
  • 11
    Beginners cant understand at all
  • 6
    Complex syntax
Pros
  • 294
    Simple and easy to start with
  • 230
    Good documentation
  • 196
    Components
  • 131
    Simple the best
  • 100
    Simplified AngularJS
Cons
  • 9
    Less Common Place
  • 5
    YXMLvsHTML Markup
  • 3
    Only support programatically multiple root nodes
  • 3
    Don't support fragments
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
React Native
React Native
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to D3.js, Vue.js?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase