Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
DbSchema vs MySQL WorkBench: What are the differences?
Introduction
DbSchema and MySQL Workbench are both popular tools used for database design and management. While they share similarities in their functionality, there are some key differences between the two.
User Interface and Ease of Use: DbSchema offers a more user-friendly and intuitive interface compared to MySQL Workbench. It provides a visually appealing and simplified design, making it easier for users to navigate and work with their databases. In contrast, MySQL Workbench has a more complex and technical interface, requiring users to have a deeper understanding of the MySQL database system.
Platform Compatibility: DbSchema supports multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it a versatile tool that can be used across different operating systems. On the other hand, MySQL Workbench primarily caters to Windows users, although it does have limited support for macOS and Linux.
Schema Synchronization: DbSchema offers a powerful schema synchronization feature, allowing users to compare and merge schemas between different databases. This makes it easier to keep databases in sync and manage changes across multiple environments. MySQL Workbench, on the other hand, does not provide this level of schema synchronization capability.
Schema Design and Documentation: DbSchema excels in its schema design and documentation capabilities. It provides a comprehensive visual design tool that allows users to create and modify database schemas using a drag-and-drop interface. Additionally, it offers automated documentation generation, making it easier to understand and communicate the structure of the database. In contrast, while MySQL Workbench does offer schema design and documentation features, it is not as robust and user-friendly as DbSchema.
Database Querying and SQL Debugging: MySQL Workbench offers advanced database querying and SQL debugging capabilities. It provides a powerful SQL editor with syntax highlighting, code completion, and query execution features. It also allows users to debug SQL statements, helping identify and resolve issues with queries. DbSchema, although it does provide basic database querying functionality, does not offer the same level of advanced SQL debugging capabilities.
Data Visualization and Charting: DbSchema stands out with its strong data visualization and charting capabilities. It allows users to create visually appealing charts, graphs, and reports based on database data. This can be useful for data analysis and presentation purposes. MySQL Workbench, on the other hand, does not have built-in data visualization and charting features.
In summary, DbSchema offers a more user-friendly interface, supports multiple platforms, provides powerful schema synchronization and design capabilities, and excels in data visualization. On the other hand, MySQL Workbench provides advanced SQL querying and debugging features, but falls short in terms of user-friendliness and platform compatibility.
I am looking to build an azure database that connects to my power bi application. Initially, I attempted to create an Azure SQL database, then realized I needed to have SQL Server Management Service in order to manage and connect between Azure SQL <=> Power BI, but since I am on a Mac, I had to use the complex installation as a workaround.
If MySQL Workbench can solve this (as the product is available on Mac), I am more than happy to proceed with this approach if it can achieve the same goal of connecting an azure database with my Power BI application
What I am trying to achieve is fairly simple: have an online cloud database that connects to my Power BI application
I am open to any other solutions as well
Thank you
As others have noted, MySQL Workbench cannot be used instead of Microsoft SQL Manager to manage Azure SQL (MS-SQL Server, I hate that Microsoft uses generic category names for their products).
If you're considering switching to MySQL (Possibly using Azure MySQL managed database), then please not that unlike MS-SQL Server, you do not need the MySQL Workbench to connect your application to MysQL: just use the correct driver for your stack, and you're all set (if your stack is using the .Net platform, use MySQL Connector/NET from: https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/net/ ).
If you do want to use a graphical interface to maintain your MySQL database, then MySQL Workbench is a great choice, but you are not limited to it - as others have mentioned, there is a plethora of competing graphical database management tools that would work just as well with MySQL - one of the advantages of choosing MySQL for your stack is the huge eco-system that is built around it.
Hello Could you give us a better idea of what Data Base Management System (DBMS) you are using at Azure? MySQL Workbench and Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) are tools developed to exclusively manage MySQL and SQL Server, respectively. If you need to manage multiple DBMS's from a single tool, I sugget you try DBeaver. There are also another alternatives: HeidiSQL, phpMyAdmin, etc. Regarding the DBMS itself, I suggest you stick with SQL Server. In my opinion it's more stable and has more features than MySQL - especially in the Standard and Enterprise editions. Regards, Lawrence
As far as I know, MySQL Workbench doesn't handle Microsoft connections, including Azure, you should try Microsoft solutions such as MS VS Code.
Microsoft provides an application known as Azure Data Studio that runs on Windows, Mac and Linux machines. It provides the ability to manage an Azure SQL database, as well as connecting to standard SQL Server databases. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/azure-data-studio/what-is?view=sql-server-ver15
Hi Aashwiin, Looking at your stack (https://stackshare.io/aashwiin82347/my-stack), it seems you are using Azure SQL Databases. I'll infer this is Microsoft SQL Server. Therefore, it certainly makes sense you stick with some of the official Microsoft Tooling to connect to it, query and administer it. You'd only be looking at MySQL Query Workbench, if you were running and connecting to a MySQL Database. - That said, could Azure MySQL (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/mysql/overview) be an option for you a this point? MySQL offers great performance. I have been running it at various companies (under AWS/RDS and AWS/Aurora) and have no reason to switch over to anything else. - Decision making-wise, how much do your want your local sql/mysql client to influence/weigh in your architecture/technology decisions, though? This can be a slippery slope. - Alternatively, other clients exist, such as "Table Plus" and allow you to connect, on Mac, to a variety of database servers, including SQL Server. It might be worth giving it a try.
We were looking a tool that would allow us to do MySQL and PostgreSQL development/administration from a single tool. We decided on Navicat Premium because it can connect to MySQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, SQL Server, Oracle, PostgreSQL, and SQLite databases - and simultaneously. It's also compatible with Amazon RDS and Microsoft Azure, which we also use.
Moreover, we previously experienced the occasional freezing and crashing in MySQL Workbench. It also suffered from a poor design, with certain features being a bit difficult to find. Meanwhile, phpMyAdmin lacked schema visualization tools and seemed better suited to lightweight day to day transactions than some of the big jobs that we needed to do.
Pros of DbSchema
- MongoDb diagrams2
- Mysql Data Explorer1
- SqlServer random data generator1
- PostgreSql random data generator1
- MongoDb documentation1
- SqlServer documentation1
- Postgres documentation1
- All databases included: PostgreSQL, MariaDb, Redshift1
- Intuitive interface, complete design using diagrams1
Pros of MySQL WorkBench
- Free7
- Simple7
- Easy to use6
- Clean UI5
- Administration and monitoring module3
