StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Cluster Management
  5. DC/OS vs Peloton

DC/OS vs Peloton

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

DC/OS
DC/OS
Stacks109
Followers180
Votes12
GitHub Stars2.4K
Forks488
Peloton
Peloton
Stacks2
Followers13
Votes0
GitHub Stars649
Forks65

DC/OS vs Peloton: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>

1. **Container Orchestration**: DC/OS focuses on managing containers orchestrated using Mesos, while Peloton is built specifically for managing Kubernetes clusters.
2. **Resource Allocation**: DC/OS has a broader resource allocation capability that can manage a variety of workloads, while Peloton is more focused on handling batch jobs and long-running services.
3. **Community Support**: DC/OS has a larger and more established community support base compared to the newer Peloton system.
4. **Scalability**: DC/OS is known for its ability to manage large-scale distributed systems efficiently, whereas Peloton may be more suited for smaller-scale deployments or specific use cases.
5. **Integration with Services**: DC/OS offers better integration with a wider range of third-party services and tools, while Peloton may have more limitations in terms of service compatibility.
6. **Customization and Extensibility**: DC/OS provides more options for customization and extensibility through its robust ecosystem of plugins and frameworks, whereas Peloton may have more limitations in this area due to its focus on Kubernetes-specific features.

In Summary, DC/OS and Peloton differ in terms of container orchestration capabilities, resource allocation focus, community support, scalability, integration with services, and customization options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

DC/OS
DC/OS
Peloton
Peloton

Unlike traditional operating systems, DC/OS spans multiple machines within a network, aggregating their resources to maximize utilization by distributed applications.

A Unified Resource Scheduler to co-schedule mixed types of workloads such as batch, stateless and stateful jobs in a single cluster for better resource utilization. Designed for web-scale companies with millions of containers and tens of thousands of nodes.

High Resource Utilization;Mixed Workload Colocation;Container Orchestration;Resource Isolation;Stateful Storage;Package Repositories;Public Cloud;Private Cloud;On-Premise;Command Line Interface;Web Interface;Elastic Scalability;High Availability;Zero Downtime Upgrades;Service Discovery;Load Balancing;Production-Ready
Elastic Resource Sharing; Resource Overcommit and Task Preemption; Optimized for Big Data and Machine Learning; High Scalability; Protobuf/gRPC based API; Co-scheduling Mixed Workloads
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.4K
GitHub Stars
649
GitHub Forks
488
GitHub Forks
65
Stacks
109
Stacks
2
Followers
180
Followers
13
Votes
12
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Easy to setup a HA cluster
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Has templates to install via AWS and Azure
  • 1
    Easy Setup
  • 1
    Easy to get services running and operate them
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
Cassandra
Cassandra
Apache Mesos
Apache Mesos
Zookeeper
Zookeeper

What are some alternatives to DC/OS, Peloton?

Nomad

Nomad

Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

Mesosphere

Mesosphere

Mesosphere offers a layer of software that organizes your machines, VMs, and cloud instances and lets applications draw from a single pool of intelligently- and dynamically-allocated resources, increasing efficiency and reducing operational complexity.

Gardener

Gardener

Many Open Source tools exist which help in creating and updating single Kubernetes clusters. However, the more clusters you need the harder it becomes to operate, monitor, manage and keep all of them alive and up-to-date. And that is exactly what project Gardener focuses on.

YARN Hadoop

YARN Hadoop

Its fundamental idea is to split up the functionalities of resource management and job scheduling/monitoring into separate daemons. The idea is to have a global ResourceManager (RM) and per-application ApplicationMaster (AM).

Atmosly

Atmosly

AI-powered Kubernetes platform for developers & DevOps. Deploy applications without complexity, with intelligent automation and one-click environments.

kops

kops

It helps you create, destroy, upgrade and maintain production-grade, highly available, Kubernetes clusters from the command line. AWS (Amazon Web Services) is currently officially supported, with GCE in beta support , and VMware vSphere in alpha, and other platforms planned.

Apache Aurora

Apache Aurora

Apache Aurora is a service scheduler that runs on top of Mesos, enabling you to run long-running services that take advantage of Mesos' scalability, fault-tolerance, and resource isolation.

Elastic Apache Mesos

Elastic Apache Mesos

Elastic Apache Mesos is a web service that automates the creation of Apache Mesos clusters on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2). It provisions EC2 instances, installs dependencies including Apache ZooKeeper and HDFS, and delivers you a cluster with all the services running.

Kocho

Kocho

Kocho provides a set of mechanisms to bootstrap AWS nodes that must follow a specific configuration with CoreOS. It sets up fleet meta-data, and patched versions of fleet, etcd, and docker when using Yochu.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana