StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Machine Learning Tools
  5. DeepSpeed vs MXNet

DeepSpeed vs MXNet

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

MXNet
MXNet
Stacks49
Followers81
Votes2
DeepSpeed
DeepSpeed
Stacks11
Followers16
Votes0

DeepSpeed vs MXNet: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code, we will outline the key differences between DeepSpeed and MXNet for website integration.

1. Performance Optimization: DeepSpeed focuses on memory optimization by using techniques like zero Redundancy, Offload Activation Memory, and Gradient compression. MXNet, on the other hand, focuses more on computational efficiency and scalability through its backend engine and distributed training capabilities.

2. Model Training Flexibility: DeepSpeed provides specific enhancements for training large-scale models efficiently, such as dynamic batch sizes, multigrid training, and ZeRO-Offload for better scalability. MXNet offers a more diverse set of pre-implemented models and various APIs for training and deploying models in different scenarios.

3. Community and Ecosystem: MXNet has a more established community and ecosystem with a wider range of pre-built models, tools, and resources available to developers. DeepSpeed, being relatively newer, is continuously growing its community and support but may have fewer resources compared to MXNet.

4. Programming Language Support: MXNet supports multiple programming languages like Python, Scala, Java, and Clojure for enhanced flexibility in development. DeepSpeed primarily focuses on Python as the main programming language for development and implementation of models.

5. Documentation and Tutorials: MXNet offers extensive documentation and tutorials for beginners and experienced developers, covering a wide range of topics from basic concepts to advanced techniques. DeepSpeed documentation is more focused on its specific features and optimization techniques, providing in-depth explanations for each.

In Summary, the key differences between DeepSpeed and MXNet lie in their focus on performance optimization, model training flexibility, community and ecosystem support, programming language compatibility, and the depth of documentation and tutorials available for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

MXNet
MXNet
DeepSpeed
DeepSpeed

A deep learning framework designed for both efficiency and flexibility. It allows you to mix symbolic and imperative programming to maximize efficiency and productivity. At its core, it contains a dynamic dependency scheduler that automatically parallelizes both symbolic and imperative operations on the fly.

It is a deep learning optimization library that makes distributed training easy, efficient, and effective. It can train DL models with over a hundred billion parameters on the current generation of GPU clusters while achieving over 5x in system performance compared to the state-of-art. Early adopters of DeepSpeed have already produced a language model (LM) with over 17B parameters called Turing-NLG, establishing a new SOTA in the LM category.

Lightweight;Portable;Flexible distributed/Mobile deep learning;
Distributed Training with Mixed Precision; Model Parallelism; Memory and Bandwidth Optimizations; Simplified training API; Gradient Clipping; Automatic loss scaling with mixed precision; Simplified Data Loader; Performance Analysis and Debugging
Statistics
Stacks
49
Stacks
11
Followers
81
Followers
16
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    User friendly
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Clojure
Clojure
Python
Python
Java
Java
JavaScript
JavaScript
Scala
Scala
Julia
Julia
PyTorch
PyTorch

What are some alternatives to MXNet, DeepSpeed?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope