StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Machine Learning Tools
  5. DeepSpeed vs Torch

DeepSpeed vs Torch

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Torch
Torch
Stacks355
Followers61
Votes0
GitHub Stars9.1K
Forks2.4K
DeepSpeed
DeepSpeed
Stacks11
Followers16
Votes0

DeepSpeed vs Torch: What are the differences?

Introduction

DeepSpeed and Torch are both popular frameworks used for deep learning applications. While both frameworks serve a similar purpose, there are several key differences between the two. In this markdown, we will highlight the major differences between DeepSpeed and Torch.

  1. Performance Optimization: DeepSpeed focuses on optimizing the performance of deep learning models. It provides various features such as model parallelism, optimizer state partitioning, and dynamic zero redundancy optimizer, which allow for efficient memory utilization and improved training speed. On the other hand, Torch primarily focuses on providing an extensive set of tools and libraries for deep learning tasks, without specific optimizations for performance.

  2. Memory Optimization: DeepSpeed provides memory optimization techniques including activation checkpointing and zero redundancy optimizer, which can significantly reduce the memory footprint of deep learning models. In contrast, Torch does not have built-in memory optimization features and relies on the user to manually optimize their models.

  3. Large Model Support: DeepSpeed is designed to enable training of extremely large models with billions or even trillions of parameters. It achieves this by leveraging techniques like model parallelism and optimizer state partitioning. On the other hand, Torch is more suitable for training models with smaller parameter sizes and does not have built-in support for training extremely large models.

  4. Ease of Use: Torch provides a user-friendly API and extensive documentation, making it easy for beginners to start using the framework. On the other hand, DeepSpeed requires some knowledge of model parallelism and memory optimization techniques, making it more suitable for advanced users who need to train large models.

  5. Compatibility: Torch is built on top of PyTorch, which means it is fully compatible with the PyTorch ecosystem of libraries and tools. This allows for seamless integration with other PyTorch-based frameworks and makes it easier to leverage existing PyTorch models and pre-trained weights. DeepSpeed also supports PyTorch models, but it introduces some changes to the training process, which may require modifications to existing code and models.

  6. Community Support: Torch has a large and active community of developers and researchers, which means there is extensive support available in terms of online forums, tutorials, and code examples. DeepSpeed, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community, but it is growing rapidly. While community support for DeepSpeed may not be as extensive as Torch, it is still sufficient to address most issues and questions.

In Summary, DeepSpeed is primarily focused on performance and memory optimization, enabling training of large models, while Torch provides a user-friendly interface and extensive community support with seamless integration with the PyTorch ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Torch
Torch
DeepSpeed
DeepSpeed

It is easy to use and efficient, thanks to an easy and fast scripting language, LuaJIT, and an underlying C/CUDA implementation.

It is a deep learning optimization library that makes distributed training easy, efficient, and effective. It can train DL models with over a hundred billion parameters on the current generation of GPU clusters while achieving over 5x in system performance compared to the state-of-art. Early adopters of DeepSpeed have already produced a language model (LM) with over 17B parameters called Turing-NLG, establishing a new SOTA in the LM category.

A powerful N-dimensional array; Lots of routines for indexing, slicing, transposing; Amazing interface to C, via LuaJIT; Linear algebra routines; Neural network, and energy-based models; Numeric optimization routines; Fast and efficient GPU support; Embeddable, with ports to iOS and Android backends
Distributed Training with Mixed Precision; Model Parallelism; Memory and Bandwidth Optimizations; Simplified training API; Gradient Clipping; Automatic loss scaling with mixed precision; Simplified Data Loader; Performance Analysis and Debugging
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
355
Stacks
11
Followers
61
Followers
16
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Python
Python
SQLFlow
SQLFlow
GraphPipe
GraphPipe
Flair
Flair
Pythia
Pythia
Databricks
Databricks
Comet.ml
Comet.ml
PyTorch
PyTorch

What are some alternatives to Torch, DeepSpeed?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope