DigitalOcean Spaces vs Openstack Swift

Overview

Openstack Swift

Stacks33

Followers91

Votes0

DigitalOcean Spaces

Stacks87

Followers99

Votes5

DigitalOcean Spaces vs Openstack Swift: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code, we will highlight the key differences between DigitalOcean Spaces and OpenStack Swift.

Architecture and Deployment: DigitalOcean Spaces is a managed object storage service, while OpenStack Swift is an open-source, standalone object storage project. DigitalOcean Spaces is built on top of scalable block storage while OpenStack Swift requires users to manage and deploy the storage infrastructure themselves, making it more complex to set up and maintain.
Cost and Pricing Model: DigitalOcean Spaces offers a straightforward pricing model based on usage tiers with predictable costs, whereas OpenStack Swift being open-source, is more affordable upfront but may incur additional costs for maintenance, upgrades, and support in the long run.
Scalability and Performance: DigitalOcean Spaces provides easy scalability with the ability to grow storage capacity and bandwidth as needed, while OpenStack Swift can also be scaled, but requires more manual intervention and configuration to achieve high-performance levels.
Integration and Ecosystem: DigitalOcean Spaces integrates seamlessly with other DigitalOcean services like Droplets and Kubernetes, providing a cohesive ecosystem for users, whereas OpenStack Swift being open-source can be integrated with a variety of systems but may require more customization and development work.
Security and Compliance Features: DigitalOcean Spaces offers robust security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, access control policies, and compliance certifications, while OpenStack Swift provides similar security measures but may require more customization and configuration to achieve the same level of protection.
Community Support and Updates: DigitalOcean Spaces is managed and updated by DigitalOcean with frequent updates and support available with their customer service, while OpenStack Swift being open-source relies more on community support for updates, bug fixes, and development, which may lead to longer response times and delays in resolving issues.

In Summary, the key differences between DigitalOcean Spaces and OpenStack Swift lie in their architecture, cost, scalability, integration, security features, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Openstack Swift	DigitalOcean Spaces
It is a highly available, distributed, eventually consistent object/blob store. Organizations can use Swift to store lots of data efficiently.	DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.
Distributed; consistent; Object/blob store	Create Spaces in an instant;Scalable storage;Available as a standalone service; Simple drag-and-drop UI;Programmatically control and migrate your data;Backups;Logs;Archives
Statistics
Stacks 33	Stacks 87
Followers 91	Followers 99
Votes 0	Votes 5
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 3 Easy setup 2 Cheap
Integrations
No integrations available	DigitalOcean

What are some alternatives to Openstack Swift, DigitalOcean Spaces?

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

DigitalOcean Spaces vs Openstack Swift: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code, we will highlight the key differences between DigitalOcean Spaces and OpenStack Swift.

Architecture and Deployment: DigitalOcean Spaces is a managed object storage service, while OpenStack Swift is an open-source, standalone object storage project. DigitalOcean Spaces is built on top of scalable block storage while OpenStack Swift requires users to manage and deploy the storage infrastructure themselves, making it more complex to set up and maintain.
Cost and Pricing Model: DigitalOcean Spaces offers a straightforward pricing model based on usage tiers with predictable costs, whereas OpenStack Swift being open-source, is more affordable upfront but may incur additional costs for maintenance, upgrades, and support in the long run.
Scalability and Performance: DigitalOcean Spaces provides easy scalability with the ability to grow storage capacity and bandwidth as needed, while OpenStack Swift can also be scaled, but requires more manual intervention and configuration to achieve high-performance levels.
Integration and Ecosystem: DigitalOcean Spaces integrates seamlessly with other DigitalOcean services like Droplets and Kubernetes, providing a cohesive ecosystem for users, whereas OpenStack Swift being open-source can be integrated with a variety of systems but may require more customization and development work.
Security and Compliance Features: DigitalOcean Spaces offers robust security features such as encryption at rest and in transit, access control policies, and compliance certifications, while OpenStack Swift provides similar security measures but may require more customization and configuration to achieve the same level of protection.
Community Support and Updates: DigitalOcean Spaces is managed and updated by DigitalOcean with frequent updates and support available with their customer service, while OpenStack Swift being open-source relies more on community support for updates, bug fixes, and development, which may lead to longer response times and delays in resolving issues.

In Summary, the key differences between DigitalOcean Spaces and OpenStack Swift lie in their architecture, cost, scalability, integration, security features, and community support.