StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Django Channels vs Dropwizard

Django Channels vs Dropwizard

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Dropwizard
Dropwizard
Stacks309
Followers366
Votes182
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks3.4K
Django Channels
Django Channels
Stacks100
Followers130
Votes1
GitHub Stars6.3K
Forks816

Django Channels vs Dropwizard: What are the differences?

Developers describe Django Channels as "It extends Django's abilities beyond HTTP - to handle WebSockets, chat protocols, IoT protocols". It does this by taking the core of Django and adding a fully asynchronous layer underneath, running Django itself in a synchronous mode but handling connections and sockets asynchronously, and giving you the choice to write in either style. On the other hand, Dropwizard is detailed as "Java framework for developing ops-friendly, high-performance, RESTful web services". Dropwizard is a sneaky way of making fast Java web applications. Dropwizard pulls together stable, mature libraries from the Java ecosystem into a simple, light-weight package that lets you focus on getting things done.

Django Channels and Dropwizard can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Django Channels and Dropwizard are both open source tools. Dropwizard with 7.3K GitHub stars and 3.05K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Django Channels with 3.94K GitHub stars and 542 GitHub forks.

Yammer, ClassPass, and Okta are some of the popular companies that use Dropwizard, whereas Django Channels is used by Webscope.io, NUU, and Deepomatic. Dropwizard has a broader approval, being mentioned in 62 company stacks & 127 developers stacks; compared to Django Channels, which is listed in 10 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Dropwizard
Dropwizard
Django Channels
Django Channels

Dropwizard is a sneaky way of making fast Java web applications. Dropwizard pulls together stable, mature libraries from the Java ecosystem into a simple, light-weight package that lets you focus on getting things done.

It does this by taking the core of Django and adding a fully asynchronous layer underneath, running Django itself in a synchronous mode but handling connections and sockets asynchronously, and giving you the choice to write in either style.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Stars
6.3K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
816
Stacks
309
Stacks
100
Followers
366
Followers
130
Votes
182
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 27
    Quick and easy to get a new http service going
  • 23
    Health monitoring
  • 20
    Metrics integration
  • 20
    Easy setup
  • 18
    Good conventions
Cons
  • 2
    Slightly more confusing dependencies
  • 1
    Not on ThoughtWorks radar since 2014
Pros
  • 1
    Open source
Integrations
Java
Java
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Dropwizard, Django Channels?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase