StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Django Channels vs Finatra

Django Channels vs Finatra

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Finatra
Finatra
Stacks36
Followers52
Votes13
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks404
Django Channels
Django Channels
Stacks100
Followers130
Votes1
GitHub Stars6.3K
Forks816

Django Channels vs Finatra: What are the differences?

Developers describe Django Channels as "It extends Django's abilities beyond HTTP - to handle WebSockets, chat protocols, IoT protocols". It does this by taking the core of Django and adding a fully asynchronous layer underneath, running Django itself in a synchronous mode but handling connections and sockets asynchronously, and giving you the choice to write in either style. On the other hand, Finatra is detailed as "Fast, testable, Scala services built on TwitterServer and Finagle, by Twitter". At Twitter, Finagle provides the building blocks for most of the code written on the JVM. It has long-served as Twitter's extensible, protocol-agnostic, highly-scalable RPC framework.

Django Channels and Finatra belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

Django Channels and Finatra are both open source tools. Django Channels with 3.94K GitHub stars and 542 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Finatra with 1.94K GitHub stars and 353 GitHub forks.

Criteo, ZocDoc, and Clara Lending are some of the popular companies that use Finatra, whereas Django Channels is used by Webscope.io, NUU, and Deepomatic. Finatra has a broader approval, being mentioned in 5 company stacks & 17 developers stacks; compared to Django Channels, which is listed in 10 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Finatra
Finatra
Django Channels
Django Channels

At Twitter, Finagle provides the building blocks for most of the code written on the JVM. It has long-served as Twitter's extensible, protocol-agnostic, highly-scalable RPC framework.

It does this by taking the core of Django and adding a fully asynchronous layer underneath, running Django itself in a synchronous mode but handling connections and sockets asynchronously, and giving you the choice to write in either style.

Production use as Twitter’s HTTP framework;~50 times faster than v1.6 in several benchmarks;Powerful feature and integration test support;Optional JSR-330 Dependency Injection using Google Guice;Jackson based JSON parsing supporting required fields, default values, and custom validations;Logback MDC integration with com.twitter.util.Local for contextual logging across futures
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Stars
6.3K
GitHub Forks
404
GitHub Forks
816
Stacks
36
Stacks
100
Followers
52
Followers
130
Votes
13
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Fast
  • 6
    Easy
Pros
  • 1
    Open source

What are some alternatives to Finatra, Django Channels?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase