Django Channels vs Mojolicious

Django Channels vs Mojolicious: What are the differences?

Developers describe Django Channels as "It extends Django's abilities beyond HTTP - to handle WebSockets, chat protocols, IoT protocols". It does this by taking the core of Django and adding a fully asynchronous layer underneath, running Django itself in a synchronous mode but handling connections and sockets asynchronously, and giving you the choice to write in either style. On the other hand, Mojolicious is detailed as "Perl real-time web framework". Back in the early days of the web, many people learned Perl because of a wonderful Perl library called CGI. It was simple enough to get started without knowing much about the language and powerful enough to keep you going, learning by doing was much fun. While most of the techniques used are outdated now, the idea behind it is not. Mojolicious is a new attempt at implementing this idea using state of the art technology.

Django Channels and Mojolicious can be categorized as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.

Django Channels and Mojolicious are both open source tools. It seems that Django Channels with 3.94K GitHub stars and 542 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Mojolicious with 2.14K GitHub stars and 500 GitHub forks.

According to the StackShare community, Mojolicious has a broader approval, being mentioned in 10 company stacks & 30 developers stacks; compared to Django Channels, which is listed in 10 company stacks and 6 developer stacks.