Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Django Channels

101
130
+ 1
1
Tornado

451
409
+ 1
167
Add tool

Django Channels vs Tornado: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between Django Channels and Tornado. Django Channels and Tornado are both popular frameworks used for building real-time web applications. However, there are several notable differences between the two.

  1. Architecture Design: Django Channels is built on top of the Django web framework and provides a layer for handling WebSocket connections, as well as supporting other protocols like HTTP. On the other hand, Tornado is a complete web framework that includes native support for WebSockets, allowing developers to handle real-time communication without any additional libraries or dependencies.

  2. Scalability: Django Channels is designed to work well with Django's traditional synchronous model, making it easier to integrate real-time features into existing Django applications. It uses a hybrid approach where synchronous code is still used for most tasks, while asynchronous code is used for handling long-running operations. Tornado, on the other hand, is built around an asynchronous event-driven model, making it more efficient when handling a large number of concurrent connections and tasks.

  3. WebSocket Support: Django Channels abstracts the WebSocket protocol and provides a high-level API for handling WebSocket connections. It also includes support for Channels, which allows developers to build multi-user apps with WebSockets. Tornado, on the other hand, has native support for WebSockets and provides a low-level API for handling WebSocket connections directly.

  4. Ease of Use: Django Channels provides a higher level of abstraction and follows a more traditional request/response model, making it easier for developers familiar with Django to understand and use. Tornado, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and requires developers to understand the asynchronous programming model and the event-driven architecture.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Django Channels benefits from the large Django community and ecosystem, which provides a wide range of third-party packages, libraries, and documentation. Tornado has its own dedicated community and ecosystem, although it may not be as extensive as Django's.

  6. Maturity and Stability: Django Channels is a relatively newer project compared to Tornado. While Django Channels has gained popularity and is actively maintained, Tornado has been around for longer and has been extensively used in production environments, making it a more mature and stable choice for building real-time web applications.

In summary, Django Channels and Tornado differ in their architecture design, scalability, WebSocket support, ease of use, community and ecosystem, as well as maturity and stability. Developers should consider these differences when choosing the appropriate framework for their real-time web application needs.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Django Channels
Pros of Tornado
  • 1
    Open source
  • 37
    Open source
  • 31
    So fast
  • 27
    Great for microservices architecture
  • 20
    Websockets
  • 17
    Simple
  • 14
    Asynchronous
  • 11
    Python
  • 7
    Lightweight
  • 3
    Handles well persistent connexions

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Django Channels
Cons of Tornado
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 2
      Event loop is complicated

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Django Channels?

    It does this by taking the core of Django and adding a fully asynchronous layer underneath, running Django itself in a synchronous mode but handling connections and sockets asynchronously, and giving you the choice to write in either style.

    What is Tornado?

    By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Django Channels?
    What companies use Tornado?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Django Channels?
    What tools integrate with Tornado?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to Django Channels and Tornado?
      Twisted
      Twisted is an event-driven networking engine written in Python and licensed under the open source ​MIT license. Twisted runs on Python 2 and an ever growing subset also works with Python 3. Twisted also supports many common network protocols, including SMTP, POP3, IMAP, SSHv2, and DNS.
      Celery
      Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
      Pushpin
      Pushpin is a reverse proxy server that makes it easy to build realtime web services. The project is unique among realtime push solutions in that it is designed to address the needs of API creators.
      asyncio
      This module provides infrastructure for writing single-threaded concurrent code using coroutines, multiplexing I/O access over sockets and other resources, running network clients and servers, and other related primitives.
      REST
      An architectural style for developing web services. A distributed system framework that uses Web protocols and technologies.
      See all alternatives