StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Django vs Django Channels

Django vs Django Channels

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Django
Django
Stacks38.7K
Followers34.8K
Votes4.2K
GitHub Stars85.6K
Forks33.2K
Django Channels
Django Channels
Stacks100
Followers130
Votes1
GitHub Stars6.3K
Forks816

Django vs Django Channels: What are the differences?

Introduction

Django and Django Channels are both web development frameworks for Python, but they have key differences in their functionality and capabilities.

  1. Configuration: Django is a high-level web framework that follows the model-view-controller (MVC) architectural pattern. It provides a pre-configured set of tools and functionalities for building web applications. Django Channels, on the other hand, is an extension to Django that enables the development of real-time applications using WebSockets and other asynchronous protocols.

  2. Handling Asynchronous Tasks: While Django primarily handles synchronous requests and responses, Django Channels allows for handling asynchronous tasks, such as real-time data streaming, chat applications, and notifications. It provides an event-driven architecture that can efficiently handle multiple connections without blocking the main thread.

  3. WebSockets Support: Django Channels offers native support for WebSockets, which allows for bidirectional communication between the client and server in real-time. This is particularly useful for applications that require instant updates or push notifications. Django, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for WebSockets, although it can be integrated with third-party libraries for WebSocket functionality.

  4. Scalability: Django is well-suited for building traditional web applications, handling synchronous requests and responses. However, when it comes to handling a large number of concurrent connections or long-running processes, Django Channels provides better scalability due to its asynchronous nature. It is designed to handle high traffic and real-time applications with ease.

  5. Routing: Django uses a URL routing system to map URLs to views and functions. Django Channels also includes a routing system, but it is specifically designed for handling WebSocket and asynchronous protocols. It allows for routing based on the message type and contents, enabling more fine-grained control over how messages are processed and distributed.

  6. Backwards Compatibility: Django aims to provide a stable and backward-compatible framework, which means that changes and updates are introduced gradually to minimize breaking existing applications. However, Django Channels is a relatively new addition to the Django ecosystem and may require updating existing code to take advantage of its features. Additionally, as Django Channels has a narrower focus on real-time and asynchronous applications, it may not be suitable for all use cases that Django can handle.

In summary, Django is a robust framework for building traditional web applications, while Django Channels extends Django's capabilities to include real-time and asynchronous functionality, particularly for handling WebSocket connections. Django Channels is suitable for applications that require real-time updates and bidirectional communication, providing scalability and efficient handling of asynchronous tasks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Django, Django Channels

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Decided

Since I came from python I had two choices: #django or #flask. It felt like it was a better idea to go for #django considering I was building a blogging platform, this is kind of what #django was made for. On the other hand, #rails seems to be a fantastic framework to get things done. Although I do not regret any of my time spent on developing with #django I want to give @{#rails}|topic:null| a try some day in the future for the sake of curiosity.

438k views438k
Comments
Sandeep
Sandeep

Jun 13, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptJinjaJinja

I have learned both Python and JavaScript. I also tried my hand at Django. But i found it difficult to work with Django, on frontend its Jinja format is very confusing and limited. I have not tried Node.js yet and unsure which tool to go ahead with. I want an internship as soon as possible so please answer keeping that in mind.

599k views599k
Comments
Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Django
Django
Django Channels
Django Channels

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

It does this by taking the core of Django and adding a fully asynchronous layer underneath, running Django itself in a synchronous mode but handling connections and sockets asynchronously, and giving you the choice to write in either style.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
85.6K
GitHub Stars
6.3K
GitHub Forks
33.2K
GitHub Forks
816
Stacks
38.7K
Stacks
100
Followers
34.8K
Followers
130
Votes
4.2K
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 678
    Rapid development
  • 488
    Open source
  • 426
    Great community
  • 380
    Easy to learn
  • 277
    Mvc
Cons
  • 26
    Underpowered templating
  • 22
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 22
    Underpowered ORM
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
Pros
  • 1
    Open source
Integrations
Python
Python
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Django, Django Channels?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase