StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Django vs TurboGears

Django vs TurboGears

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Django
Django
Stacks38.7K
Followers34.8K
Votes4.2K
GitHub Stars85.6K
Forks33.2K
TurboGears
TurboGears
Stacks8
Followers21
Votes0

Django vs TurboGears: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference 1: Database Support Django:

    • Django provides support for various databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, and Oracle. TurboGears:
    • TurboGears primarily focuses on using SQLAlchemy as the default Object Relational Mapping (ORM) tool, which allows it to work with different databases.
  2. Key difference 2: Templating Language Django:

    • Django uses its own templating language called Django Template Language (DTL), which has a syntax that closely resembles Python. TurboGears:
    • TurboGears uses the Jinja2 templating engine, which provides a more flexible and expressive syntax compared to DTL.
  3. Key difference 3: Modularity Django:

    • Django follows a monolithic approach, where all the necessary components (e.g., ORM, templating, routing) are included in the core framework. TurboGears:
    • TurboGears takes a more modular approach, with different components being provided as separate libraries. This allows developers to choose and use only the components they need.
  4. Key difference 4: Authentication Django:

    • Django includes a built-in authentication system that provides features like user registration, login, and password reset functionality. TurboGears:
    • TurboGears does not have a built-in authentication system, but it provides easy integration with third-party libraries like Flask-Login or TurboAuth.
  5. Key difference 5: URL Routing Django:

    • Django uses a URL routing system that is based on regular expressions, allowing for powerful and flexible URL matching patterns. TurboGears:
    • TurboGears uses a routing system that is based on decorators, providing a more intuitive and cleaner syntax for defining URLs.
  6. Key difference 6: Development Philosophy Django:

    • Django follows the principle of "batteries included," providing a comprehensive set of tools and features out-of-the-box to enable rapid development. TurboGears:
    • TurboGears follows the principle of "minimalistic simplicity," focusing on providing a lightweight and flexible framework that allows for extensive customization and modular development.

In Summary, Django and TurboGears differ in their database support, templating language, modularity approach, authentication, URL routing system, and development philosophy.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Django, TurboGears

Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Decided

Since I came from python I had two choices: #django or #flask. It felt like it was a better idea to go for #django considering I was building a blogging platform, this is kind of what #django was made for. On the other hand, #rails seems to be a fantastic framework to get things done. Although I do not regret any of my time spent on developing with #django I want to give @{#rails}|topic:null| a try some day in the future for the sake of curiosity.

438k views438k
Comments
Sandeep
Sandeep

Jun 13, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonJavaScriptJavaScriptJinjaJinja

I have learned both Python and JavaScript. I also tried my hand at Django. But i found it difficult to work with Django, on frontend its Jinja format is very confusing and limited. I have not tried Node.js yet and unsure which tool to go ahead with. I want an internship as soon as possible so please answer keeping that in mind.

599k views599k
Comments
Ing. Alvaro
Ing. Alvaro

Software Systems Engineer at Ripio

May 21, 2020

Decided

Decided to change all my stack to microsoft technologies for they behave just great together. It is very easy to set up and deploy projects using visual studio and azure. Visual studio is also an amazing IDE, if not the best, when used for C#, it allows you to work in every aspect of your software.

Visual studio templates for ASP.NET MVC are the best I've found compared to django, rails, laravel, and others.

524k views524k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Django
Django
TurboGears
TurboGears

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

It is a Python web application framework consisting of several WSGI components such as WebOb, SQLAlchemy, Genshi and Repoze. It is built on top of the experience of several next generation web frameworks including TurboGears1 (of course), Django, and Rails.

-
Rapid Web Application development ;Data Persistance; Transaction manager to help with multi-dababase deployments; Built on top of the experience of several next generation web frameworks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
85.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
33.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
38.7K
Stacks
8
Followers
34.8K
Followers
21
Votes
4.2K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 678
    Rapid development
  • 488
    Open source
  • 426
    Great community
  • 380
    Easy to learn
  • 277
    Mvc
Cons
  • 26
    Underpowered templating
  • 22
    Underpowered ORM
  • 22
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Python
Python
MongoDB
MongoDB
RequireJS
RequireJS
Rails
Rails
OpenLDAP
OpenLDAP
JSON
JSON

What are some alternatives to Django, TurboGears?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase