DocPad vs Middleman: What are the differences?
Developers describe DocPad as "Designers and developers can create websites faster than ever before". Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before. On the other hand, Middleman is detailed as "A static site generator using all the shortcuts and tools in modern web development". Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.
DocPad and Middleman can be categorized as "Static Site Generators" tools.
Some of the features offered by DocPad are:
- Pre-Built Skeletons
- Language Agnostic
On the other hand, Middleman provides the following key features:
- Sass for DRY stylesheets
- Multiple asset management solutions, including Sprockets
"Plugins. Easy to use" is the primary reason why developers consider DocPad over the competitors, whereas "Rails for static sites" was stated as the key factor in picking Middleman.
DocPad and Middleman are both open source tools. Middleman with 6.49K GitHub stars and 696 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than DocPad with 2.99K GitHub stars and 250 GitHub forks.
What is DocPad?
What is Middleman?
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using DocPad?
What are the cons of using Middleman?
What companies use DocPad?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with DocPad?
[FREE] We use middleman for its ease and speed to develop and deploy micro/marketing sites.
Flexible static site generator, doesn't need to be more complex than this.