StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Machine Learning Tools
  5. .NET for Apache Spark vs Gluon

.NET for Apache Spark vs Gluon

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Gluon
Gluon
Stacks29
Followers80
Votes3
GitHub Stars2.3K
Forks219
.NET for Apache Spark
.NET for Apache Spark
Stacks31
Followers46
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.1K
Forks329

.NET for Apache Spark vs Gluon: What are the differences?

# Introduction
In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between .NET for Apache Spark and Gluon.

1. **Compatibility with respective ecosystems**: .NET for Apache Spark is tightly integrated with the .NET ecosystem, allowing seamless compatibility with other .NET components and libraries. On the other hand, Gluon is designed to work smoothly with Java-based environments, providing extensive support for Java libraries and frameworks.
   
2. **Programming languages support**: .NET for Apache Spark supports multiple languages like C# and F#, providing options for developers to choose their preferred language. In contrast, Gluon primarily focuses on Java, limiting the language options available for developers.
    
3. **Community and support**: .NET for Apache Spark has a growing community of .NET developers contributing to the project and providing support. Gluon, being a part of the Java ecosystem, benefits from the extensive support and resources available for Java developers.
    
4. **Performance optimization**: .NET for Apache Spark offers various optimization techniques specific to the .NET platform, enabling better performance for .NET applications. Gluon, optimized for Java, leverages Java-specific optimization strategies to enhance performance.
    
5. **Integration with respective data processing libraries**: .NET for Apache Spark seamlessly integrates with popular .NET data processing libraries, allowing smooth data processing workflows within the .NET ecosystem. While Gluon integrates effortlessly with Java-based data processing libraries to facilitate data processing tasks within Java environments.
    
6. **Development environment**: .NET for Apache Spark provides dedicated tooling and support within the Visual Studio IDE, streamlining the development process for .NET developers. Gluon, being Java-centric, offers seamless integration with IDEs like Eclipse and IntelliJ IDEA for Java development.

In Summary, the key differences between .NET for Apache Spark and Gluon lie in their compatibility, language support, community, performance optimization, integration with data processing libraries, and development environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Gluon
Gluon
.NET for Apache Spark
.NET for Apache Spark

A new open source deep learning interface which allows developers to more easily and quickly build machine learning models, without compromising performance. Gluon provides a clear, concise API for defining machine learning models using a collection of pre-built, optimized neural network components.

With these .NET APIs, you can access the most popular Dataframe and SparkSQL aspects of Apache Spark, for working with structured data, and Spark Structured Streaming, for working with streaming data.

Simple, Easy-to-Understand Code: Gluon offers a full set of plug-and-play neural network building blocks, including predefined layers, optimizers, and initializers.;Flexible, Imperative Structure: Gluon does not require the neural network model to be rigidly defined, but rather brings the training algorithm and model closer together to provide flexibility in the development process.;Dynamic Graphs: Gluon enables developers to define neural network models that are dynamic, meaning they can be built on the fly, with any structure, and using any of Python’s native control flow.;High Performance: Gluon provides all of the above benefits without impacting the training speed that the underlying engine provides.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.3K
GitHub Stars
2.1K
GitHub Forks
219
GitHub Forks
329
Stacks
29
Stacks
31
Followers
80
Followers
46
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Good learning materials
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Apache Spark
Apache Spark
.NET
.NET
F#
F#
C#
C#
Ubuntu
Ubuntu

What are some alternatives to Gluon, .NET for Apache Spark?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

PyTorch

PyTorch

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

H2O

H2O

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope