StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Dropwizard vs Hoodie

Dropwizard vs Hoodie

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Hoodie
Hoodie
Stacks14
Followers29
Votes16
Dropwizard
Dropwizard
Stacks309
Followers366
Votes182
GitHub Stars8.6K
Forks3.4K

Dropwizard vs Hoodie: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Key differences between Dropwizard and Hoodie:

  1. Architecture: Dropwizard is a Java framework designed for developing ops-friendly, high-performance, RESTful web services. It follows a more modular approach by combining proven libraries like Jetty for serving HTTP requests, Jersey for RESTful resources, and Jackson for JSON parsing. On the other hand, Hoodie is a data-centric back-end framework that focuses on simplifying data layer operations like data ingestion, updates, and queries for real-time applications, providing features like schema evolution, incremental processing, and built-in data indexing.

  2. Use Case: Dropwizard is well-suited for building lightweight, stateless, and highly scalable web applications that require minimal configuration and easy deployment. It is commonly used for microservices, APIs, and web applications that focus on performance and operational simplicity. In contrast, Hoodie is ideal for applications that require event-sourced architectures, real-time analytics, and complex data processing scenarios, where the data layer needs to handle large volumes of data updates efficiently and support incremental processing for near real-time insights.

  3. Technology Stack: Dropwizard leverages battle-tested Java libraries and frameworks like Guice, Jackson, Metrics, and Logback to provide a complete solution for building RESTful web services. It focuses on providing a robust HTTP server, serialization/deserialization, monitoring, and logging out of the box. Hoodie, on the other hand, is built on Hadoop and Apache Spark ecosystems, utilizing technologies like Apache Parquet, Apache Avro, Apache Hive, and Delta Lake to handle massive data sets, data versioning, and data lineage for complex analytics workflows.

  4. Community Adoption: Dropwizard has a strong community support with a rich ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and documentation available for developers. It is widely used in production environments by companies across various industries for building scalable web services. Hoodie, being a relatively newer framework, is gaining traction in the big data and real-time analytics domain, with a growing community of contributors and users who are exploring its capabilities for building data-centric applications.

  5. Data Management Approach: Dropwizard focuses on providing a framework for building web services and does not include specific data management functionalities out of the box. Data handling and persistence mechanisms need to be integrated separately based on the application requirements. In contrast, Hoodie is designed to simplify the data layer complexities by providing built-in support for data versioning, read/write optimizations, and efficient data processing capabilities like incremental processing and compaction, making it easier for developers to manage and query large data sets efficiently.

In Summary, Dropwizard is a Java framework for building RESTful web services, ideal for lightweight, scalable applications, while Hoodie is a data-centric framework focusing on simplifying data layer operations for real-time analytics and event-sourced architectures.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Hoodie, Dropwizard

Hampton
Hampton

VP of Engineering at Veue

Oct 4, 2020

Decided

Starting a new company in 2020, with a whole new stack, is a really interesting opportunity for me to look back over the last 20 years of my career with web software and make the right decision for my company.

And, I went with the most radical decision– which is to ignore "sexy" / "hype" technologies almost entirely, and go back to a stack that I first used over 15 years ago.

For my purposes, we are building a video streaming platform, where I wanted rapid customer-facing feature development, high testability, simple scaling, and ease of hiring great, experienced talent. To be clear, our web platform is NOT responsible for handling the actual bits and bytes of the video itself, that's an entirely different stack. It simply needs to manage the business rules and the customers experience of the video content.

I reviewed a lot of different technologies, but none of them seemed to fit the bill as well as Rails did! The hype train had long left the station with Rails, and the community is a little more sparse than it was previously. And, to be honest, Ruby was the language that was easiest for developers, but I find that most languages out there have adopted many of it's innovations for ease of use – or at least corrected their own.

Even with all of that, Rails still seems like the best framework for developing web applications that are no more complex than they need to be. And that's key to me, because it's very easy to go use React and Redux and GraphQL and a whole host of AWS Lamba's to power my blog... but you simply don't actually NEED that.

There are two choices I made in our stack that were new for me personally, and very different than what I would have chosen even 5 years ago.

  1. Postgres - I decided to switch from MySql to Postgres for this project. I wanted to use UUID's instead of numeric primary keys, and knew I'd have a couple places where better JSON/object support would be key. Mysql remains far more popular, but almost every developer I respect has switched and preferred Postgres with a strong passion. It's not "sexy" but it's considered "better".

  2. Stimulus.js - This was definitely the biggest and wildest choice to make. Stimulus is a Javascript framework by my old friend Sam Stephenson (Prototype.js, rbenv, turbolinks) and DHH, and it is a sort of radical declaration that your Javascript in the browser can be both powerful and modern AND simple. It leans heavily on the belief that HTML-is-good and that data-* attributes are good. It focuses on the actions and interactions and not on the rendering aspects. It took me a while to wrap my head around, and I still have to remind myself, that server-side-HTML is how you solve many problems with this stack, and avoid trying to re-render things just in the browser. So far, I'm happy with this choice, but it is definitely a radical departure from the current trends.

471k views471k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hoodie
Hoodie
Dropwizard
Dropwizard

We want to enable you to build complete web apps in days, without having to worry about backends, databases or servers, all with an open source library that's as simple to use as jQuery.

Dropwizard is a sneaky way of making fast Java web applications. Dropwizard pulls together stable, mature libraries from the Java ecosystem into a simple, light-weight package that lets you focus on getting things done.

Offline by default: Hoodie stores data locally first and syncs them in the background when possible. Great for mobile applications;One-line signup/signin/signout/resend password and other account management functions;Document-based storage with CouchDB: no building database schemas;Event system: easily listen for changes in the data to trigger view updates;JavaScript and JSON on every layer. Even the database queries are JS;Convenient, super simple local dev setup that optionally even configures .dev-domains for you;Deploy to Nodejitsu with minimal effort;Flexible, npm-based plugin system in case you need more capability;Send multi-part emails with attachments from the client
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
8.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
14
Stacks
309
Followers
29
Followers
366
Votes
16
Votes
182
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    JSON
  • 4
    Reduces boilerplate
  • 3
    Offline first
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Mobile friendly
Pros
  • 27
    Quick and easy to get a new http service going
  • 23
    Health monitoring
  • 20
    Metrics integration
  • 20
    Easy setup
  • 18
    Good conventions
Cons
  • 2
    Slightly more confusing dependencies
  • 1
    Not on ThoughtWorks radar since 2014
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Hoodie, Dropwizard?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase