Dropwizard vs Spring MVC

Overview

Dropwizard

Stacks309

Followers366

Votes182

GitHub Stars8.6K

Forks3.4K

Spring MVC

Stacks479

Followers518

Votes0

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Dropwizard vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown highlights the key differences between Dropwizard and Spring MVC for web development.

1. **Architecture Approach**: Dropwizard follows the convention over configuration approach, offering a set of pre-configured components for building and deploying web applications quickly. Meanwhile, Spring MVC provides more flexibility through its dependency injection and aspect-oriented programming features, allowing developers to customize the application according to specific requirements.
2. **Community Support and Ecosystem**: Spring MVC has a vast community and ecosystem, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins available, making it easier for developers to find solutions and support. In contrast, Dropwizard has a smaller community base and ecosystem, which may result in limited resources and fewer options for developers seeking help or additional functionalities.
3. **Ease of Configuration**: Dropwizard simplifies the configuration process by bundling components like Jetty, Jersey, and Jackson, reducing the configuration overhead for developers. On the other hand, Spring MVC requires more configuration due to its modular nature, allowing developers to choose specific components and customize the application behavior accordingly.
4. **Integration with Other Frameworks**: Spring MVC seamlessly integrates with other Spring projects like Spring Boot, Spring Data, and Spring Security, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for building enterprise applications. Dropwizard, while efficient for building standalone applications, may lack the seamless integration capabilities and extensive feature sets provided by the Spring framework.
5. **Performance and Scalability**: Dropwizard is known for its lightweight, high-performance nature, making it a suitable choice for building microservices and APIs that require low latency and fast response times. Spring MVC, while powerful and flexible, may introduce additional overhead due to its robust feature set, affecting performance in certain scenarios.
6. **Development Paradigm**: Dropwizard promotes a minimalist, opinionated approach to web development, focusing on simplicity and efficiency in building applications. Conversely, Spring MVC follows a more comprehensive, feature-rich development paradigm, allowing developers to leverage a wide range of tools and libraries for building complex and scalable applications.

In Summary, the key differences between Dropwizard and Spring MVC lie in their architecture approach, community support, ease of configuration, integration capabilities, performance/scalability, and development paradigms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Dropwizard	Spring MVC
Dropwizard is a sneaky way of making fast Java web applications. Dropwizard pulls together stable, mature libraries from the Java ecosystem into a simple, light-weight package that lets you focus on getting things done.	A Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern and provides an elegant solution to use MVC in spring framework by the help of DispatcherServlet.
-	Clear separation of roles; Customizable binding and validation; Adaptability; Flexibility
Statistics
GitHub Stars 8.6K	GitHub Stars 59.1K
GitHub Forks 3.4K	GitHub Forks 38.8K
Stacks 309	Stacks 479
Followers 366	Followers 518
Votes 182	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 27 Quick and easy to get a new http service going 23 Health monitoring 20 Metrics integration 20 Easy setup 18 Good conventions Cons 2 Slightly more confusing dependencies 1 Not on ThoughtWorks radar since 2014	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java	AngularJS Bootstrap Spring Boot Hibernate

What are some alternatives to Dropwizard, Spring MVC?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Dropwizard vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown highlights the key differences between Dropwizard and Spring MVC for web development.

1. **Architecture Approach**: Dropwizard follows the convention over configuration approach, offering a set of pre-configured components for building and deploying web applications quickly. Meanwhile, Spring MVC provides more flexibility through its dependency injection and aspect-oriented programming features, allowing developers to customize the application according to specific requirements.
2. **Community Support and Ecosystem**: Spring MVC has a vast community and ecosystem, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins available, making it easier for developers to find solutions and support. In contrast, Dropwizard has a smaller community base and ecosystem, which may result in limited resources and fewer options for developers seeking help or additional functionalities.
3. **Ease of Configuration**: Dropwizard simplifies the configuration process by bundling components like Jetty, Jersey, and Jackson, reducing the configuration overhead for developers. On the other hand, Spring MVC requires more configuration due to its modular nature, allowing developers to choose specific components and customize the application behavior accordingly.
4. **Integration with Other Frameworks**: Spring MVC seamlessly integrates with other Spring projects like Spring Boot, Spring Data, and Spring Security, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for building enterprise applications. Dropwizard, while efficient for building standalone applications, may lack the seamless integration capabilities and extensive feature sets provided by the Spring framework.
5. **Performance and Scalability**: Dropwizard is known for its lightweight, high-performance nature, making it a suitable choice for building microservices and APIs that require low latency and fast response times. Spring MVC, while powerful and flexible, may introduce additional overhead due to its robust feature set, affecting performance in certain scenarios.
6. **Development Paradigm**: Dropwizard promotes a minimalist, opinionated approach to web development, focusing on simplicity and efficiency in building applications. Conversely, Spring MVC follows a more comprehensive, feature-rich development paradigm, allowing developers to leverage a wide range of tools and libraries for building complex and scalable applications.

Dropwizard vs Spring MVC

Overview