StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. DuckDB vs HBase

DuckDB vs HBase

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

HBase
HBase
Stacks511
Followers498
Votes15
GitHub Stars5.5K
Forks3.4K
DuckDB
DuckDB
Stacks49
Followers60
Votes0

DuckDB vs HBase: What are the differences?

DuckDB and HBase are two data management systems with different characteristics and purposes. Here are the key differences between them:

  1. Data Model: DuckDB is a columnar analytical database that is optimized for handling complex queries on large datasets. It stores data in columns rather than rows, allowing for efficient data compression and query performance. On the other hand, HBase is a distributed, scalable, non-relational database that follows a key-value store model. It is designed for storing and managing large amounts of structured and semi-structured data in real-time.

  2. Query Language: DuckDB supports standard SQL as its query language, making it easy for users familiar with SQL to interact with the database. HBase, on the other hand, uses HBase Shell, which is a command-line interface that allows users to interact with the database using commands similar to those in SQL, but with some differences and limitations.

  3. Data Consistency: DuckDB guarantees strong consistency, meaning that when a write is committed, any subsequent read will see the updated data. HBase, however, provides eventual consistency, which means that there might be a delay before all replicas of the data get updated. This tradeoff in consistency allows HBase to achieve high availability and fault tolerance.

  4. Scale and Distribution: DuckDB is not designed for massive scalability or distribution across multiple nodes. It is primarily used for analytical workloads on a single machine or within a small cluster. In contrast, HBase is built for scalability and can handle massive amounts of data across a large number of commodity hardware nodes.

  5. Data Storage: DuckDB stores data on disk and leverages compression techniques to optimize storage space. HBase, on the other hand, stores data in a distributed file system like HDFS, breaking it into blocks and distributing it across the nodes in the cluster.

  6. Access Patterns: DuckDB is optimized for read-heavy workloads, where complex analytical queries need to be executed efficiently. It provides fast query performance by utilizing columnar storage and various optimizations. HBase, on the other hand, is designed for high-throughput read and write operations, making it suitable for real-time applications that require low-latency data access.

In Summary, DuckDB is a columnar analytical database with strong consistency and a focus on read-heavy workloads, while HBase is a distributed key-value store with eventual consistency, scalability, and suitability for real-time applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

HBase
HBase
DuckDB
DuckDB

Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.

It is an embedded database designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast while embedded in another process. It is designed to be easy to install and easy to use. DuckDB has no external dependencies. It has bindings for C/C++, Python and R.

-
Embedded database; Designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast; No external dependencies
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
511
Stacks
49
Followers
498
Followers
60
Votes
15
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Performance
  • 5
    OLTP
  • 1
    Fast Point Queries
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
C++
C++
R Language
R Language

What are some alternatives to HBase, DuckDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase