StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. DuckDB vs InfluxDB

DuckDB vs InfluxDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes175
DuckDB
DuckDB
Stacks49
Followers60
Votes0

DuckDB vs InfluxDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

DuckDB and InfluxDB are both popular databases used for different purposes. DuckDB is an in-memory analytical database, while InfluxDB is a time-series database designed for handling large amounts of time-stamped data. Despite both being databases, they have key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Storage: DuckDB stores data in memory, allowing for faster query processing. In contrast, InfluxDB stores data on disk and uses an indexing mechanism to optimize data retrieval based on time. This makes InfluxDB more suitable for handling time-series data where historical records need to be stored and retrieved efficiently.

  2. Data Model: DuckDB is based on a relational data model with support for SQL queries. It uses tables and columns to organize data. InfluxDB, on the other hand, uses a time-series data model where data is structured around a timestamp and associated tags and fields. Queries in InfluxDB are made using InfluxQL, a SQL-like language specifically tailored for time-series data.

  3. Querying Capabilities: DuckDB provides a wide range of SQL features, including joins, subqueries, and complex aggregations. It also supports advanced analytical functions such as window functions and common table expressions. InfluxDB primarily focuses on time-series data queries and provides functions for handling data based on time intervals, aggregations over time ranges, and downsampling. Its query language allows for filtering and grouping data based on tags and fields.

  4. Scalability and Performance: DuckDB is designed for in-memory processing and is optimized for analytical workloads. It can efficiently handle large datasets and perform complex queries. InfluxDB is built for scalable time-series data storage and processing. It uses a distributed architecture that allows for horizontal scaling, making it suitable for high-volume time-series data ingestion and querying.

  5. Tooling and Integrations: DuckDB has integrations with popular programming languages such as Python, R, and Julia, allowing seamless integration with various analytical libraries and frameworks. InfluxDB offers a range of tools and integrations for handling time-series data. It has built-in support for common data ingestion protocols such as HTTP, Telegraf, and MQTT, making it easy to collect and store data from different sources.

  6. Use Cases: DuckDB is commonly used for analytical workloads, particularly in data science and business intelligence applications. It is well-suited for ad hoc queries and exploratory data analysis. InfluxDB is widely used in scenarios where collecting, storing, and querying time-series data is critical, such as IoT applications, monitoring systems, and financial data analysis.

In summary, DuckDB and InfluxDB differ in their storage mechanisms, data models, querying capabilities, scalability, tooling, and use cases. While DuckDB is optimized for analytical workloads and offers SQL-based querying, InfluxDB specializes in time-series data storage and retrieval, providing specific functions and language for efficient handling of time-based data.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on InfluxDB, DuckDB

Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
Benoit
Benoit

Principal Engineer at Sqreen

Sep 21, 2019

Decided

I chose TimescaleDB because to be the backend system of our production monitoring system. We needed to be able to keep track of multiple high cardinality dimensions.

The drawbacks of this decision are our monitoring system is a bit more ad hoc than it used to (New Relic Insights)

We are combining this with Grafana for display and Telegraf for data collection

155k views155k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

InfluxDB
InfluxDB
DuckDB
DuckDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

It is an embedded database designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast while embedded in another process. It is designed to be easy to install and easy to use. DuckDB has no external dependencies. It has bindings for C/C++, Python and R.

Time-Centric Functions;Scalable Metrics; Events;Native HTTP API;Powerful Query Language;Built-in Explorer
Embedded database; Designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast; No external dependencies
Statistics
Stacks
1.0K
Stacks
49
Followers
1.2K
Followers
60
Votes
175
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 59
    Time-series data analysis
  • 30
    Easy setup, no dependencies
  • 24
    Fast, scalable & open source
  • 21
    Open source
  • 20
    Real-time analytics
Cons
  • 4
    Instability
  • 1
    Proprietary query language
  • 1
    HA or Clustering is only in paid version
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
C++
C++
R Language
R Language

What are some alternatives to InfluxDB, DuckDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase