StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Front End Package Manager
  5. Duo vs Mou

Duo vs Mou

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Duo
Duo
Stacks24
Followers43
Votes1
GitHub Stars3.4K
Forks115
Mou
Mou
Stacks8
Followers15
Votes0

Duo vs Mou: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between Duo and Mou

Duo and Mou are both text editors that are popular among developers and writers. While they serve the same purpose, there are several key differences that set them apart from each other. Let's explore these differences:

  1. User Interface: Duo has a more minimalistic and clean user interface, perfect for those who prefer simplicity. On the other hand, Mou offers a more customizable interface with various themes and options for personalization.

  2. Compatibility: Duo is a cross-platform text editor that is compatible with Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible to a wider range of users. In contrast, Mou is only available for macOS devices, limiting its usage to Apple users.

  3. Markdown Features: Both Duo and Mou support Markdown, but Mou provides a more extensive range of markdown features. It includes live preview, highlighting, and auto-completion, allowing users to have a more seamless writing experience.

  4. Export Options: Duo allows users to export their documents in various formats, including HTML, PDF, and Word, providing flexibility in sharing and publishing their work. Conversely, Mou primarily supports exporting in HTML format, limiting the options for users.

  5. Price: Duo is a completely free text editor, making it an attractive choice for budget-conscious users. Alternatively, Mou offers a free trial version for a limited period, but to access all its features, users must purchase the full version.

  6. Development Active: Duo has a more active development community, frequently releasing updates and improvements based on user feedback. In contrast, Mou has seen less frequent updates in recent years, indicating a slower pace of development.

In summary, Duo and Mou differ in their user interface, compatibility, markdown features, export options, pricing, and development activity. While Duo offers a simpler and more accessible experience, Mou provides a more customizable interface and comprehensive markdown features for macOS users. Choose the one that aligns with your requirements and preferences for a seamless text editing experience.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Duo
Duo
Mou
Mou

Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless.

When current available Markdown editors are almost all for general writers, Mou is different: It's for web developers. Syntax highlighting, live preview, sync scroll, fullscreen mode, auto save, powerful actions, auto pair, custom themes and CSS, HTML and PDF export, enhanced CJK support.

has first-class support for Javascript, HTML and CSS;exposes a unix-y command line interface;pulls source directly from GitHub with semantic versioning;supports source transforms, like Coffeescript or Sass;does not require a manifest
Actions;Enhanced CJK Support;View Control;Custom Themes;Custom CSS;Incremental Search;Auto Completion;Export HTML;Words Counter;Command Line
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
115
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
24
Stacks
8
Followers
43
Followers
15
Votes
1
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Lean and efficient
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Duo, Mou?

npm

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Yarn

Yarn

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

MacDown

MacDown

MacDown is an open source Markdown editor for OS X, released under the MIT License. It is heavily influenced by Chen Luo’s Mou.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Verdaccio

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

Pika.dev

Pika.dev

It is a new kind of package registry for the modern web. It handles formatting, configuring, building and publishing every package on the registry, so that individual authors don't have to.

Bundler

Bundler

It provides a consistent environment for Ruby projects by tracking and installing the exact gems and versions that are needed. It is an exit from dependency hell, and ensures that the gems you need are present in development, staging, and production.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana