StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. Eel vs Nativefier

Eel vs Nativefier

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Nativefier
Nativefier
Stacks29
Followers95
Votes2
Eel
Eel
Stacks6
Followers83
Votes0

Eel vs Nativefier: What are the differences?

# Description of Key Differences Between Eel and Nativefier

1. **User Interface**: Eel allows developers to create interactive desktop GUI applications using web technologies, while Nativefier is primarily focused on converting websites into standalone applications without providing interactive UI elements.
2. **Compatibility**: Eel supports creating applications for multiple platforms such as Windows, macOS, and Linux, whereas Nativefier is more limited in terms of platform compatibility and is mainly used for macOS and Windows applications.
3. **Underlying Technology**: Eel utilizes web rendering engines like Chromium to render UI components, providing a more dynamic and flexible user experience, while Nativefier relies more on browser components, resulting in a simpler and faster application.
4. **Integration with Python**: Eel seamlessly integrates with Python, allowing developers to build desktop applications using Python backend logic and HTML/CSS/JavaScript frontend, whereas Nativefier does not require programming skills and can create applications directly from URLs.
5. **Customization**: Eel offers extensive customization options for UI design by utilizing web technologies, enabling developers to create visually appealing and feature-rich applications, while Nativefier's customization capabilities are limited to basic functionalities like custom icons and menu options.
6. **Community Support**: Eel has a growing community of contributors and active development, providing ongoing updates, documentation, and support, whereas Nativefier has a smaller community base and may have limited resources for troubleshooting and enhancements.

In Summary, Eel and Nativefier differ in terms of user interface capabilities, compatibility, underlying technology, integration with Python, customization options, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Nativefier
Nativefier
Eel
Eel

Nativefier is a command line tool that allows you to easily create a desktop application for any web site with succinct and minimal configuration. Apps are wrapped by Electron in an OS executable (.app, .exe, etc.) for use on Windows, OSX and Linux.

Python3 library for making simple Electron-like offline HTML/JS GUI apps, with full access to Python capabilities and libraries. It hosts a local webserver, then lets you annotate functions in Python so that they can be called from Javascript, and vice versa.

Statistics
Stacks
29
Stacks
6
Followers
95
Followers
83
Votes
2
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Has a better Javascript support, and is much faster
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to Nativefier, Eel?

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

Qt5

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

JavaFX

JavaFX

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase