StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Desktop Development
  5. Electron vs Electron Fiddle

Electron vs Electron Fiddle

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Electron
Electron
Stacks11.6K
Followers10.0K
Votes148
Electron Fiddle
Electron Fiddle
Stacks3
Followers14
Votes0
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks739

Electron vs Electron Fiddle: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will explore the key differences between Electron and Electron Fiddle.

  1. Development Environment: Electron provides a full-featured development environment for building desktop applications using web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. On the other hand, Electron Fiddle is a streamlined and simplified tool specifically designed for quickly prototyping Electron applications.

  2. Feature Set: Electron offers a wide range of features, including access to the native operating system APIs, support for multiple windows, menu bars, tray icons, and the ability to package applications for distribution. In contrast, Electron Fiddle focuses on providing a minimalistic feature set, with a focus on code editing, running and debugging Electron applications.

  3. Ease of Use: Electron requires setting up a development environment, configuring dependencies, and managing project structure manually. In comparison, Electron Fiddle simplifies the process by providing a pre-configured development environment, allowing developers to quickly start prototyping without the need for extensive setup or configuration.

  4. Learning Curve: Electron has a steeper learning curve due to its comprehensive set of features and the need to understand how to manage multiple windows and access native functionalities. Conversely, Electron Fiddle's simplified interface and focused feature set make it easier for beginners to get started quickly and understand the basics of Electron development.

  5. Community and Support: Electron has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, forums, and resources available to developers. Electron Fiddle, being a subset of Electron, also benefits from this community and support network, making it easier to find resources and assistance when needed.

  6. Use Cases: Electron is suitable for developing complex desktop applications with rich user interfaces and access to native APIs. It is commonly used for building applications such as code editors, chat applications, and media players. On the other hand, Electron Fiddle is primarily used for quickly prototyping and experimenting with Electron applications, making it ideal for developers who want to quickly test ideas or learn Electron.

In summary, Electron provides a comprehensive development environment with a wide range of features for building desktop applications, while Electron Fiddle offers a simplified and streamlined tool for prototyping and experimenting with Electron applications, making it more accessible to beginners and those looking for a quick way to test ideas.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Electron, Electron Fiddle

Semih
Semih

Software Engineering Manager

Oct 1, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaScriptJavaScriptHTML5HTML5.NET.NET

Hi,

We are planning to develop a brand new UX for an already existing desktop software. The previous version is developed on C#.NET with Winforms & WPF. Our plan is to use JavaScript/HTML5 based frontend technologies for the new software. For some components, we are highly dependent on .NET/ .NET Core because the JS-based versions are not mature enough.

What would you choose for a desktop-based Engineering Software that supports multi-OS and has rich UI capabilities considering the .NET dependencies?

Thanks in advance,

Semih

57.9k views57.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Electron
Electron
Electron Fiddle
Electron Fiddle

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Electron Fiddle lets you create and play with small Electron experiments. Start with a template & choose the version of Electron you want to run it with, and play around. Then, save your Fiddle either as a GitHub Gist or to a local folder. Once pushed to GitHub, anyone can quickly try your Fiddle out by just entering it in the address bar.

Use HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with Chromium and Node.js to build your app.;Electron is open source; maintained by GitHub and an active community.;Electron apps build and run on Mac, Windows, and Linux.;Automatic updates;Crash reporting;Windows installers;Debugging & profiling;Native menus & notifications
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
739
Stacks
11.6K
Stacks
3
Followers
10.0K
Followers
14
Votes
148
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 69
    Easy to make rich cross platform desktop applications
  • 53
    Open source
  • 14
    Great looking apps such as Slack and Visual Studio Code
  • 8
    Because it's cross platform
  • 4
    Use Node.js in the Main Process
Cons
  • 19
    Uses a lot of memory
  • 8
    User experience never as good as a native app
  • 4
    No proper documentation
  • 4
    Does not native
  • 1
    Wrong reference for dom inspection
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Electron, Electron Fiddle?

Sciter

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

Qt5

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

JavaFX

JavaFX

It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.

React Native Desktop

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

SDL

SDL

It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase