StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. Ember.js vs Handlebars.js

Ember.js vs Handlebars.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ember.js
Ember.js
Stacks1.6K
Followers865
Votes775
GitHub Stars22.6K
Forks4.2K
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js
Stacks8.3K
Followers3.2K
Votes308

Ember.js vs Handlebars.js: What are the differences?

# Introduction
Ember.js and Handlebars.js are both popular frameworks used for frontend web development, with each offering unique functionalities and features. 

1. **Architecture**: Ember.js is a full-fledged front-end framework that follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, providing a comprehensive solution for building robust web applications. On the other hand, Handlebars.js is a templating engine that focuses solely on generating the HTML markup with dynamic content by using template strings.

2. **Data Binding**: Ember.js provides two-way data binding, meaning any changes to the model will automatically reflect in the view and vice versa. In contrast, Handlebars.js only offers one-way data binding, where changes in the model do not automatically update the view unless explicitly re-rendered.

3. **Component-based Structure**: Ember.js promotes a component-based structure, allowing developers to create reusable UI components that can be easily integrated into different parts of the application. Handlebars.js, on the other hand, primarily focuses on generating HTML from templates without a specific emphasis on component-based architecture.

4. **Routing**: Ember.js has built-in routing capabilities that enable developers to define routes, map URLs to templates, and manage navigation within the application. Handlebars.js, being a templating engine, does not provide routing functionalities by default, requiring developers to rely on external libraries or frameworks for implementing routing logic.

5. **Dependency Management**: Ember.js comes with its own dependency injection system, which simplifies managing dependencies between different components in the application. Handlebars.js, being a templating engine, does not offer built-in dependency management capabilities and requires developers to handle dependencies manually.

6. **Flexibility**: Ember.js provides a more opinionated framework with predefined conventions and structure, making it easier for developers to get started with building web applications. Handlebars.js, being a lightweight templating engine, offers more flexibility in terms of integrating with other libraries or frameworks, allowing developers to choose their preferred tools and technologies for different aspects of web development.

In Summary, Ember.js is a comprehensive front-end framework with MVC architecture, two-way data binding, component-based structure, built-in routing, dependency management, and predefined conventions, while Handlebars.js is a lightweight templating engine focusing on generating HTML from templates with one-way data binding and flexibility in integration with other tools. 

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ember.js, Handlebars.js

neha
neha

CEO at NMTechEdge

Sep 25, 2020

Review

Have you ever stuck with the question that which one is the best front-end framework for you?

With continuous web development progress, the trends of the latest front-end technologies are also continuously changing with more and more sophisticated web features. These top front-end frameworks and libraries have made your complex web tasks more flexible and efficient.

Check out top front end frameworks and their features at https://www.nmtechedge.com/2020/09/24/top-4-trending-front-end-frameworks-2020/

200k views200k
Comments
Asad
Asad

Software Engineer at Lisec Automation

Jun 15, 2020

Needs adviceon.NET.NETHandlebars.jsHandlebars.js

@All: I am searching for the best template engine for .NET. I started looking into several template engines, including the Dotliquid, Handlebars.js, Scriban, and Razorlight. I found handlebar a bit difficult to use when using the loops and condition because you need to register for helper first. DotLiquid and Scriban were easy to use and in Razorlight I did not find the example for loops.

Can you please suggest which template engine is best suited for the use of conditional/list and looping and why? Or if anybody could provide me a resource or link where I can compare which is best?

Thanks In Advance

240k views240k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ember.js
Ember.js
Handlebars.js
Handlebars.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Creating web apps;Building UI
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
4.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
8.3K
Followers
865
Followers
3.2K
Votes
775
Votes
308
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 126
    Elegant
  • 97
    Quick to develop
  • 83
    Great mvc
  • 82
    Great community
  • 73
    Great router
Cons
  • 2
    Very little flexibility
  • 2
    Too much convention, too little configuration
  • 1
    Hard to use if your API isn't RESTful
  • 1
    Hard to integrate with Non Ruby apps
Pros
  • 106
    Simple
  • 76
    Great templating language
  • 50
    Open source
  • 36
    Logicless
  • 20
    Integrates well into any codebase
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Mustache
Mustache

What are some alternatives to Ember.js, Handlebars.js?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Aurelia

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Mithril

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Marionette

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Mustache

Mustache

Mustache is a logic-less template syntax. It can be used for HTML, config files, source code - anything. It works by expanding tags in a template using values provided in a hash or object. We call it "logic-less" because there are no if statements, else clauses, or for loops. Instead there are only tags. Some tags are replaced with a value, some nothing, and others a series of values.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase