StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Entity Framework vs ServiceStack

Entity Framework vs ServiceStack

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ServiceStack
ServiceStack
Stacks191
Followers49
Votes0
Entity Framework
Entity Framework
Stacks2.1K
Followers240
Votes19

Entity Framework vs ServiceStack: What are the differences?

Introduction

Entity Framework and ServiceStack are both popular frameworks used for developing web applications. While they share similarities in terms of providing ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) capabilities, there are key differences between the two that set them apart. This article aims to highlight these differences in a concise manner.

  1. Data Access Approach: Entity Framework follows a code-first or database-first approach, where entities are mapped to database tables and SQL queries are generated automatically. On the other hand, ServiceStack follows a data-first approach, where data models are generated from an existing database schema using a code generation tool.

  2. Integration with ASP.NET: Entity Framework is tightly integrated with the ASP.NET framework, providing seamless integration and support for features such as authentication, caching, and session management. ServiceStack, on the other hand, is a standalone framework that can be used with any web development stack, providing flexibility in terms of technology choices.

  3. Performance and Scalability: Entity Framework has evolved over time to improve its performance and scalability, offering features such as compiled queries and caching mechanisms. ServiceStack, on the other hand, is known for its high-performance capabilities and lightweight footprint, making it suitable for highly scalable and fast applications.

  4. Service-oriented Architecture: ServiceStack follows a service-oriented architecture (SOA) approach, emphasizing the building of services using message-based communication. It provides extensive support for creating and consuming RESTful APIs, as well as other communication protocols like SOAP and MQTT. Entity Framework, on the other hand, primarily focuses on database access and does not provide built-in support for creating services or handling communication protocols.

  5. Cross-platform Compatibility: Entity Framework is primarily designed for use with Microsoft's .NET framework and is tightly coupled with Windows-based technologies. ServiceStack, on the other hand, is built to be cross-platform compatible and can be used with different operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS.

  6. License and Cost: Entity Framework is an open-source framework that is available under the MIT License, making it free to use for both commercial and non-commercial applications. ServiceStack, however, offers both free and commercial licenses, with the commercial versions providing additional features and support.

In summary, Entity Framework and ServiceStack differ in terms of their data access approach, integration with ASP.NET, performance and scalability, service-oriented architecture, cross-platform compatibility, and licensing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ServiceStack
ServiceStack
Entity Framework
Entity Framework

It is a configuration free, code-first, light-weight framework built on top of ASP.NET for building services and web applications. As the name suggests, it is a stack of services. It provides with just everything that one needs for building end-to-end web services.

It is an object-relational mapper that enables .NET developers to work with relational data using domain-specific objects. It eliminates the need for most of the data-access code that developers usually need to write.

-
ORM, Work with relational data using domain-specific objects;Eliminates the need for most of the data-access code
Statistics
Stacks
191
Stacks
2.1K
Followers
49
Followers
240
Votes
0
Votes
19
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 6
    LINQ
  • 3
    Object Oriented
  • 3
    Strongly Object-Oriented
  • 2
    Multiple approach (Model/Database/Code) first
  • 2
    Code first approach
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
MongoDB
MongoDB
Firebird
Firebird
.NET
.NET
Oracle
Oracle
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
SQLite
SQLite
MySQL
MySQL
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
IBM DB2
IBM DB2

What are some alternatives to ServiceStack, Entity Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase