Expo vs NativeScript: What are the differences?
Expo and NativeScript are two popular frameworks for building mobile applications. While both frameworks are used to develop cross-platform apps, there are key differences that set them apart in terms of development workflow, performance, and capabilities.
Platform Support: Expo is primarily designed for building mobile apps that target iOS and Android platforms, with limited support for web applications. In contrast, NativeScript supports not only iOS and Android but also additional platforms like Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing a wider range of deployment options.
UI Components: Expo offers a set of pre-built UI components that are easy to use and customize, allowing developers to quickly create user interfaces. NativeScript, on the other hand, provides access to the native UI components of each platform, resulting in more visually consistent and integrated app experiences.
Development Workflow: Expo provides a seamless development workflow where applications can be easily tested and previewed using the Expo Client app on a physical device or a simulator. In contrast, NativeScript requires a build step to compile the code and deploy the app for testing and previewing, which may introduce additional complexity and time.
Access to Native APIs: Expo abstracts the access to native APIs, providing a set of unified APIs that work across platforms. This approach simplifies the development process but may limit access to certain device-specific features and functionalities. NativeScript, on the other hand, allows direct access to the native APIs of each platform, offering more fine-grained control and the ability to leverage advanced capabilities.
In summary, Expo and NativeScript differ in terms of code execution, platform support, UI components, third-party libraries, development workflow, and access to native APIs, providing developers with various options to choose from based on their specific project requirements.