Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Expo

713
676
+ 1
66
Qt

450
628
+ 1
138
Add tool

Expo vs Qt: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Expo and Qt. Expo and Qt are two different frameworks used for creating mobile and desktop applications, respectively. Understanding their differences can help developers make an informed decision on which framework to use for their projects.

  1. Deployment Platforms: Expo is primarily focused on developing mobile applications and is specifically designed for iOS and Android platforms. On the other hand, Qt is a cross-platform development framework that supports multiple platforms including desktop, mobile, embedded, and more. Qt's versatility allows developers to target a wider range of devices and operating systems.

  2. Programming Languages: Expo is mainly based on JavaScript and uses React Native as the underlying framework. This makes it easier for web developers to transition into mobile app development. Meanwhile, Qt primarily uses C++ for development, making it more suitable for developers with a strong background in C++ or who require low-level optimizations and performance.

  3. User Interface Design: Expo relies heavily on a declarative UI style, where developers define the UI components using JSX and React Native styles. This approach simplifies the UI design process and promotes code reusability. In contrast, Qt provides a more traditional approach to UI design, allowing developers to create interfaces using a combination of Qt Widgets or QML (Qt Meta-Object Language), which offer more control and flexibility while sacrificing some simplicity.

  4. Native Access and APIs: Expo provides a comprehensive set of pre-built APIs and modules that simplify access to device functionalities, such as camera, geolocation, sensors, and more. However, Expo apps are executed within a managed runtime environment, which restricts direct access to all native APIs and capabilities. On the other hand, Qt offers direct access to device APIs and allows developers to utilize platform-specific features more extensively, enabling greater control and optimization options.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Expo has a thriving open-source community and a large number of community-built components and libraries available. This active community ensures a wide range of resources and support for Expo developers. Qt also has a strong developer community, but it has been traditionally more focused on desktop application development. However, Qt's growing popularity in mobile and embedded development has also expanded its community and ecosystem offerings.

  6. Development Tools and IDEs: Expo provides a comprehensive development toolset, including Expo CLI, Expo client app, and a web-based development environment known as Expo DevTools. These tools enable developers to quickly develop, test, and preview their apps without the need for complex setup or device emulators. Qt, on the other hand, provides its own IDE called Qt Creator, which offers powerful development and debugging features specifically tailored for Qt applications. Qt Creator also integrates well with other popular IDEs, providing flexibility for developers.

In summary, Expo and Qt differ in terms of deployment platforms, programming languages, user interface design, native access and APIs, community and ecosystem, and development tools. Understanding these differences can help developers choose the right framework based on their specific requirements and expertise.

Advice on Expo and Qt
Needs advice
on
ExpoExpoReact NativeReact Native
and
ReduxRedux
in

Hello guys, I am new here. So, if I posted without specific guidelines, please ignore.

Basically, I am an iOS developer and developing native apps for the last three years. Recently, I started learning React Native to develop apps for both platforms. If anyone out there knows any useful resources that will become a better react native developer.

#newbie

See more
Replies (1)
Javier Silva Ortíz
Senior Full Stack Developer at Aleph Engineering · | 6 upvotes · 305.1K views
Recommends
on
ReduxRedux

Well, the first resource I would recommend you is my upcoming book by Packt Publishing, "Professional React Native", but it's due late January next year :) . Now jokes aside (the book's real by the way :) ), the easiest way to build a iOS/Android/Web app with React Native is to do: npm install -g expo-cli expo init some-project cd some-project expo eject

You might have heard of Expo, but trust me, stay away from it. Expo highest value is that it's an already pre-configured 3 platforms environment, but if you don't eject then you're vendor-locked to what Expo has to offer in iOS and Android, which is very poor compared to going full React Native on these platforms, they can't even handle Google Sign In properly and by the way, even if your app is 10 lines of code your app size will be over 40 MB if you don't eject, yep it's that bad, plus the performance is regular and the loading times slow, not to mention that you're stuck with their build service which the free tier makes you wait for hours for a free build slot. It's important to note that when ejecting you don't lose the Web, you simply do expo start --web to start your dev environment and expo build:web to build a static website that you can serve with any web server. Regarding state management, don't bother with "lifting state up" philosophies mixed with Context API to manage your state, lifting state is a great pattern and helps your codebase, Context is great to avoid prop-drilling, but NEVER mix them to achieve app-wide state management, for that, simply go for Redux or MobX, the hype is all about Redux, but I consider MobX far better in many aspects. However, as you're getting new into this I would recommend you start with Redux AND PLEASE grab yourself npm install @manaflair/redux-batch so that you can batch updates and don't bring your app to a crawl. Forget that "connect HOC" thing with React-Redux, don't bother for a second with it, go with Hooks and useSelector and useDispatch and the likes, it will make your code SO much cleaner and smaller. Adopt clean and new Hooks philosophy, avoid writing class components as much as possible and write function components augmented with Hooks.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Expo
Pros of Qt
  • 15
    Free
  • 13
    Hot Reload
  • 9
    Easy to learn
  • 9
    Common ios and android app setup
  • 6
    Open Source
  • 6
    Streamlined
  • 5
    Builds into a React Native app
  • 2
    PWA supported
  • 1
    Plugins for web use with Next.js
  • 17
    High Performance
  • 13
    Declarative, easy and flexible UI
  • 12
    Cross platform
  • 12
    Performance
  • 9
    Fast prototyping
  • 8
    Easiest integration with C++
  • 8
    Up to date framework
  • 7
    Python
  • 6
    Multiple license including Open Source and Commercial
  • 6
    Safe 2D Renderer
  • 5
    Great Community Support
  • 4
    HW Accelerated UI
  • 4
    Game Engine like UI system
  • 3
    No history of broken compatibility with a major version
  • 3
    JIT and QML Compiler
  • 3
    True cross-platform framework with native code compile
  • 3
    Reliable for industrial use
  • 3
    Pure C++
  • 3
    Been using it since the 90s - runs anywhere does it all
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Easy Integrating to DX and OpenGL and Vulkan
  • 2
    From high to low level coding
  • 1
    Learning Curve
  • 1
    Great mobile support with Felgo add-on
  • 1
    Native looking GUI

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Expo
Cons of Qt
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 5
      Paid
    • 4
      C++ is not so productive
    • 2
      Lack of community support
    • 1
      Lack of libraries
    • 1
      Not detailed documentation

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Expo?

    It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

    What is Qt?

    Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Expo?
    What companies use Qt?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Expo?
    What tools integrate with Qt?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Expo and Qt?
    React Native
    React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.
    Ionic
    Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.
    Create React Native App
    Create React Native App allows you to work with all of the Components and APIs in React Native, as well as most of the JavaScript APIs that the Expo App provides.
    Flutter
    Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.
    JavaScript
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    See all alternatives