Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Kyoto Tycoon vs FaunaDB: What are the differences?
What is Kyoto Tycoon? A handy cache/storage server. Kyoto Tycoon is a lightweight database server with auto expiration mechanism, which is useful to handle cache data and persistent data of various applications. Kyoto Tycoon is also a package of network interface to the DBM called Kyoto Cabinet.
What is FaunaDB? The database built for serverless, featuring native GraphQL. FaunaDB is a global serverless database that gives you ubiquitous, low latency access to app data, without sacrificing data correctness and scale. It eliminates layers of app code for manually handling data anomalies, security, and scale, creating a friendlier dev experience for you and better app experience for your users.
Kyoto Tycoon and FaunaDB belong to "Databases" category of the tech stack.
Pros of Fauna
- 100% ACID5
- Generous free tier4
- Removes server provisioning or maintenance4
- Low latency global CDN's3
- No more n+1 problems (+ GraphQL)3
- Works well with GraphQL3
- Also supports SQL, CQL3
- No ORM layer needed2
Pros of Kyoto Tycoon
- RESTful API2
- Simple, persistent Key-Value Store2
- Easy setup1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Fauna
- Susceptible to DDoS (& others) use timeouts throttling1
- Must keep app secrets encrypted1
- Log stack traces to avoid improper exception handling1