StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. FeathersJS vs hapi

FeathersJS vs hapi

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

hapi
hapi
Stacks434
Followers456
Votes87
FeathersJS
FeathersJS
Stacks162
Followers341
Votes70
GitHub Stars15.2K
Forks793

FeathersJS vs hapi: What are the differences?

Introduction: FeathersJS and hapi are both popular Node.js frameworks used for building web applications and APIs. While they have similarities, there are key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Routing: FeathersJS provides a simple and intuitive routing system where you can define routes by specifying the HTTP method and URL pattern. It uses a service-oriented architecture, where each route maps to a specific service operation. On the other hand, hapi follows a plugin-based approach to routing, allowing you to organize your routes into separate plugins for better modularity and reusability.

  2. Authentication: FeathersJS provides built-in authentication functionality, making it easier to implement user authentication and authorization. It supports authentication strategies like local (username/password), JWT, OAuth, etc. Hapi, on the other hand, does not have built-in authentication support but has a well-documented and flexible authentication plugin called "hapi-auth-jwt2" that you can use to handle authentication needs.

  3. Database Integration: FeathersJS offers seamless integration with various databases through its database adapters, allowing you to easily work with databases like MongoDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL, etc. It provides a common API for accessing and manipulating data across different database systems. Hapi, on the other hand, does not have built-in database integration but provides extensive support for working with databases through its ecosystem of plugins.

  4. Real-Time Capabilities: FeathersJS has real-time functionality built-in, allowing you to easily build applications with real-time communication using WebSockets or other transport methods. It provides real-time event broadcasting and reactive data synchronization out of the box. Hapi does not have native support for real-time capabilities, but you can integrate third-party libraries or plugins like Socket.io to add real-time features to your hapi applications.

  5. Plugin Ecosystem: Hapi has a strong and active plugin ecosystem, with a wide range of plugins available for various functionalities like database integration, authentication, caching, logging, etc. These plugins are maintained by the community and can be easily integrated into your hapi application. FeathersJS also has a plugin ecosystem, but it is relatively smaller compared to hapi.

  6. Community and Support: Hapi has a larger and more established community compared to FeathersJS. It has been around for longer and has a larger user base, which means that there is more community support, online resources, and tutorials available for hapi. FeathersJS, although growing in popularity and having an active community, may have fewer resources and support options compared to hapi.

In summary, FeathersJS and hapi are both powerful Node.js frameworks for building web applications and APIs. FeathersJS has a simpler routing system, built-in authentication, and real-time capabilities, while hapi has a strong plugin ecosystem, extensive database integration options, and a larger community for support. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs and preferences of your project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

hapi
hapi
FeathersJS
FeathersJS

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
15.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
793
Stacks
434
Stacks
162
Followers
456
Followers
341
Votes
87
Votes
70
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 27
    Makes me Hapi making REST APIs
  • 14
    Simpler than other REST libraries
  • 14
    Configuration
  • 13
    Quality Driven Ecosystem
  • 13
    Modularization
Pros
  • 12
    Real-time
  • 7
    Choose any ORM
  • 7
    Datastore Agnostic
  • 6
    Flexible Plugins
  • 5
    Choose Socketio or Primus
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to hapi, FeathersJS?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Flask

Flask

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase