Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Finagle vs Play: What are the differences?
Introduction
When it comes to building web applications in Scala, both Finagle and Play are popular choices among developers. While they both provide tools for creating scalable and efficient applications, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.
Concurrent Programming Model: Finagle is a asynchronous, composable RPC system that is well-suited for building high-concurrency systems, while Play is a web application framework that follows a more traditional MVC pattern, which may not be as efficient for handling large volumes of concurrent requests.
Purpose and Usage: Finagle is primarily used for building distributed systems and asynchronous services, making it a great choice for microservices architecture, while Play is a full-fledged web framework that includes features like form handling, templating engines, and routing, ideal for building web applications.
Community and Support: Play has a larger community and more resources available due to its popularity as a web development framework, making it easier to find help and resources when working with Play compared to Finagle.
Performance: Finagle is known for its high-performance networking capabilities, making it a suitable choice for building applications that require low latency and high throughput, whereas Play, being more feature-rich, may not have the same level of performance in terms of handling high loads.
Flexibility and Extensibility: Finagle allows for more flexibility in terms of building custom protocols and services due to its composable nature, while Play, being more opinionated in its approach, may not provide the same level of flexibility for building custom solutions.
Learning Curve: Due to its focus on being a full-stack framework, Play may have a steeper learning curve for beginners compared to Finagle, which is more focused on specific networking and distributed systems concepts, making it easier to grasp for those with a background in these areas.
In Summary, Finagle and Play offer different strengths and are tailored for different use cases, with Finagle being more suited for building distributed systems and high-concurrency services, while Play excels in web application development with a full-fledged MVC framework.
Pros of Finagle
- Fast4
- HTTP-friendly3
- Open Source3
Pros of Play
- Scala81
- Web-friendly architecture55
- Built on akka55
- Stateless50
- High-scalable47
- Fast46
- Open source40
- Java34
- High velocity27
- Fun24
- Lightweight9
- Non-blocking io8
- Developer friendly6
- Simple template engine5
- Scalability4
- Pure love3
- Resource efficient2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Finagle
Cons of Play
- Evolves fast, keep up with releases3
- Unnecessarily complicated1