Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Finagle

69
101
+ 1
10
Play

753
606
+ 1
496
Add tool

Finagle vs Play: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to building web applications in Scala, both Finagle and Play are popular choices among developers. While they both provide tools for creating scalable and efficient applications, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.

  1. Concurrent Programming Model: Finagle is a asynchronous, composable RPC system that is well-suited for building high-concurrency systems, while Play is a web application framework that follows a more traditional MVC pattern, which may not be as efficient for handling large volumes of concurrent requests.

  2. Purpose and Usage: Finagle is primarily used for building distributed systems and asynchronous services, making it a great choice for microservices architecture, while Play is a full-fledged web framework that includes features like form handling, templating engines, and routing, ideal for building web applications.

  3. Community and Support: Play has a larger community and more resources available due to its popularity as a web development framework, making it easier to find help and resources when working with Play compared to Finagle.

  4. Performance: Finagle is known for its high-performance networking capabilities, making it a suitable choice for building applications that require low latency and high throughput, whereas Play, being more feature-rich, may not have the same level of performance in terms of handling high loads.

  5. Flexibility and Extensibility: Finagle allows for more flexibility in terms of building custom protocols and services due to its composable nature, while Play, being more opinionated in its approach, may not provide the same level of flexibility for building custom solutions.

  6. Learning Curve: Due to its focus on being a full-stack framework, Play may have a steeper learning curve for beginners compared to Finagle, which is more focused on specific networking and distributed systems concepts, making it easier to grasp for those with a background in these areas.

In Summary, Finagle and Play offer different strengths and are tailored for different use cases, with Finagle being more suited for building distributed systems and high-concurrency services, while Play excels in web application development with a full-fledged MVC framework.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Finagle
Pros of Play
  • 4
    Fast
  • 3
    HTTP-friendly
  • 3
    Open Source
  • 81
    Scala
  • 55
    Web-friendly architecture
  • 55
    Built on akka
  • 50
    Stateless
  • 47
    High-scalable
  • 46
    Fast
  • 40
    Open source
  • 34
    Java
  • 27
    High velocity
  • 24
    Fun
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 8
    Non-blocking io
  • 6
    Developer friendly
  • 5
    Simple template engine
  • 4
    Scalability
  • 3
    Pure love
  • 2
    Resource efficient

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Finagle
Cons of Play
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 3
      Evolves fast, keep up with releases
    • 1
      Unnecessarily complicated

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Finagle?

    Finagle is an extensible RPC system for the JVM, used to construct high-concurrency servers. Finagle implements uniform client and server APIs for several protocols, and is designed for high performance and concurrency.

    What is Play?

    Play Framework makes it easy to build web applications with Java & Scala. Play is based on a lightweight, stateless, web-friendly architecture. Built on Akka, Play provides predictable and minimal resource consumption (CPU, memory, threads) for highly-scalable applications.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Finagle?
    What companies use Play?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Finagle?
    What tools integrate with Play?
      No integrations found
      What are some alternatives to Finagle and Play?
      Finatra
      At Twitter, Finagle provides the building blocks for most of the code written on the JVM. It has long-served as Twitter's extensible, protocol-agnostic, highly-scalable RPC framework.
      gRPC
      gRPC is a modern open source high performance RPC framework that can run in any environment. It can efficiently connect services in and across data centers with pluggable support for load balancing, tracing, health checking...
      Akka
      Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.
      Spring Boot
      Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.
      Akka HTTP
      The Akka HTTP modules implement a full server- and client-side HTTP stack on top of akka-actor and akka-stream. It’s not a web-framework but rather a more general toolkit for providing and consuming HTTP-based services. While interaction with a browser is of course also in scope it is not the primary focus of Akka HTTP.
      See all alternatives