StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Flask vs Gin Gonic

Flask vs Gin Gonic

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic
Stacks339
Followers339
Votes16
GitHub Stars86.8K
Forks8.5K

Flask vs Gin Gonic: What are the differences?

Introduction: Flask and Gin Gonic are both web frameworks used for building web applications in different programming languages. Flask is a Python web framework, while Gin Gonic is a Go web framework. While both frameworks serve a similar purpose, there are key differences between them.

  1. Language: The most significant difference between Flask and Gin Gonic is the programming language they are built in. Flask is built in Python, a high-level, interpreted language, while Gin Gonic is built in Go, a statically typed, compiled language. This language difference affects the syntax, libraries, and ecosystem that can be utilized when developing web applications using these frameworks.

  2. Size and Complexity: Flask is known for its simplicity and minimalistic design, making it a popular choice for beginners or small-scale projects. It has a small codebase and provides the basic functionalities required for web development. On the other hand, Gin Gonic has a larger codebase and offers a more feature-rich set of functionalities, making it suitable for complex and scalable applications.

  3. Performance: Due to the difference in languages and design principles, Gin Gonic generally offers better performance compared to Flask. Go is known for its efficiency and concurrency model, which allows Gin Gonic to handle high traffic and process requests faster. Flask, although not slow, may not perform as well in scenarios requiring high throughput or heavy load.

  4. Routing and Middleware: Flask provides a built-in routing mechanism, allowing developers to define routes and handle HTTP requests easily. However, Gin Gonic offers a more robust and flexible routing system with advanced routing features like route grouping, route parameter validation, and middleware handling. This makes Gin Gonic a preferred choice when complex routing requirements are involved.

  5. Dependency Management: Flask uses pip, the de facto standard package manager for Python, to manage dependencies. Developers can easily install, update, and manage external libraries using pip. On the other hand, Go, the language used by Gin Gonic, has its own package management tool called "go get." Go get allows developers to download and install packages with ease, but it does not offer the same level of dependency management and version control as pip.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Flask benefits from a large and active Python community. There are numerous libraries, frameworks, and resources available that integrate well with Flask, enabling developers to leverage existing solutions. Gin Gonic, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller but rapidly growing community. The ecosystem around Gin Gonic may not be as extensive as Flask, but it is expanding with time.

In Summary, Flask and Gin Gonic are both web frameworks, but they differ in the programming language they use, size and complexity, performance, routing and middleware capabilities, dependency management, and community support. Flask is suited for simple projects and beginners, while Gin Gonic is suitable for more complex applications requiring high performance and advanced routing features.

Advice on Flask, Gin Gonic

Kristan Eres
Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonFlaskFlask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

391k views391k
Comments
Saurav
Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k
Comments
Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

It is an HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance. It is up to 40 times faster.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
86.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
8.5K
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
339
Followers
16.2K
Followers
339
Votes
60
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 11
    Hight performance
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Low performance
  • 1
    No wildcard routing

What are some alternatives to Flask, Gin Gonic?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase