StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Flask vs Jinja2

Flask vs Jinja2

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Flask
Flask
Stacks19.3K
Followers16.2K
Votes60
Jinja
Jinja
Stacks2.3K
Followers292
Votes8
GitHub Stars11.2K
Forks1.7K

Flask vs Jinja2: What are the differences?

Introduction

Flask and Jinja2 are both popular frameworks used in web development. While Flask is a micro web framework for Python, Jinja2 is a templating engine also written in Python.

  1. Simplicity: Flask is designed to be simple and easy to understand, making it a great choice for beginners. It has a minimalist approach and provides only the essential tools for building a web application. On the other hand, Jinja2 is a powerful and flexible templating engine that provides a wide range of features such as template inheritance and macros. It allows developers to create complex web pages with dynamic content.

  2. Functionality: Flask handles the routing and request handling of web applications, while Jinja2 focuses on the presentation layer by providing a way to generate HTML or other markup languages based on templates. Flask acts as the back-end framework, handling the server-side logic, while Jinja2 handles the front-end rendering of data.

  3. Integration with Flask: Flask comes with Jinja2 as its default template engine. This means that Flask uses Jinja2 to render the templates and provide dynamic content. Jinja2 templates are written within Flask application, allowing easy integration of templates within Flask. Developers can make use of Flask’s functionality along with Jinja2 templates to build powerful web applications.

  4. Template Syntax: Jinja2 has its own template language and syntax which is different from HTML. It provides powerful features like loops, conditionals, macros, and filters which enable developers to write dynamic templates. Flask uses Jinja2’s syntax to render templates and provide dynamic content. Flask also provides additional features to Jinja2 such as extensions and custom filters to enhance template rendering functionality.

  5. Scalability: Flask is a micro web framework, which means it is lightweight and includes only the essential components. This makes it easy to scale and customize based on specific project requirements. On the other hand, Jinja2 is a powerful templating engine that can handle complex and dynamic web pages. It provides features like template inheritance, which allows developers to define a base template and extend it with child templates, making it easier to manage large-scale projects.

  6. Community Support: Both Flask and Jinja2 have a large and active community of developers. Flask has a strong and supportive community that provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins to help developers. Jinja2 also has an active community that contributes to its development and provides support through forums, documentation, and examples.

In Summary, Flask is a minimalistic web framework that handles the server-side logic of web applications, while Jinja2 is a powerful templating engine that focuses on the presentation layer by rendering templates and providing dynamic content. Flask integrates with Jinja2 and provides additional functionality to enhance template rendering. Flask is lightweight and customizable, while Jinja2 is feature-rich and allows the creation of complex web pages. Both frameworks have active and supportive communities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Flask, Jinja

Kristan Eres
Kristan Eres

Senior Solutions Analyst

Jul 30, 2020

Needs adviceonDjangoDjangoPythonPythonFlaskFlask

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

392k views392k
Comments
Saurav
Saurav

Application Devloper at Bny Mellon

Mar 27, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

337k views337k
Comments
Girish
Girish

Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems

Apr 17, 2020

Needs adviceonPythonPythonNamekoNamekoRabbitMQRabbitMQ

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Flask
Flask
Jinja
Jinja

Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

It is a full featured template engine for Python. It has full unicode support, an optional integrated sandboxed execution environment, widely used and BSD licensed.

-
Powerful automatic HTML escaping system for cross site scripting prevention; Template inheritance makes it possible to use the same or a similar layout for all templates; High performance with just in time compilation to Python bytecode; Translate your template sources on first load into Python bytecode for best runtime performance; Optional ahead-of-time compilation; Easy to debug; Configurable syntax; Template designer helpers
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
11.2K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
19.3K
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
16.2K
Followers
292
Votes
60
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
Cons
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
Pros
  • 8
    It is simple to use
Integrations
No integrations available
Ember.js
Ember.js
Git
Git
JavaScript
JavaScript
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js

What are some alternatives to Flask, Jinja?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

TypeScript

TypeScript

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Pug

Pug

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js

Handlebars.js is an extension to the Mustache templating language created by Chris Wanstrath. Handlebars.js and Mustache are both logicless templating languages that keep the view and the code separated like we all know they should be.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase