Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Flask

19.1K
16.1K
+ 1
60
MEAN

344
617
+ 1
594
Add tool

Flask vs MEAN: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between Flask and MEAN stack are outlined below:

1. **Architecture**:
   Flask is a lightweight web application framework that follows a microservices architecture where each component performs a specific task. In contrast, MEAN stack is a full-stack framework that combines four major technologies - MongoDB, Express.js, Angular, and Node.js - for building dynamic web applications in a unified ecosystem.

2. **Programming Language**:
   Flask is primarily based on Python, offering simplicity and readability, whereas the MEAN stack includes languages like JavaScript for both server-side and client-side development. This difference can impact the choice of developers based on their language preference and expertise.

3. **Database Integration**:
   Flask allows seamless integration with various databases such as SQLite, PostgreSQL, and MySQL, providing flexibility in database selection. On the other hand, the MEAN stack leverages MongoDB, a NoSQL database, eliminating the need for separate configuration and abstraction layers commonly found in traditional relational databases.

4. **Front-End Development**:
   In Flask, developers have the freedom to choose front-end frameworks like React, Vue.js, or Angular for building user interfaces. However, the MEAN stack includes Angular as its default front-end framework, streamlining the development process with built-in features designed for single-page applications.

5. **Community Support**:
   Flask boasts a vibrant community of developers contributing to its continuous improvement and expansion through various plugins and extensions. Meanwhile, the MEAN stack benefits from the extensive support of developers worldwide due to the popularity of JavaScript and its associated technologies.

6. **Learning Curve**:
   Flask, with its minimalist approach, is easier to learn for beginners or those with a background in Python. In contrast, the MEAN stack may have a steeper learning curve for novice developers due to the integration of multiple technologies and intricate workflows involved in building applications.

In Summary, Flask and MEAN stack differ in architecture, programming languages, database integration, front-end development, community support, and learning curve, catering to diverse preferences and requirements of developers.

Advice on Flask and MEAN
kristan-dev
Senior Solutions Analyst · | 8 upvotes · 381.4K views

My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.

Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?

See more
Replies (1)
Rafael Torres
Technical Lead at 4Agile · | 9 upvotes · 371.5K views

If you want to be a Web developer with knowledge in another frontend and NoSql technology, maybe continue with Flask. However, if you want to create very fast solutions to grow up with a new business and merge these with data analysis and other tools, Django is the answer. Basically read more about the service architecture where you feel more comfortable, Microservice or Monolithic, but please will not married with any because they solve issues to different contexts.

See more
Girish Sharma
Software Engineer at FireVisor Systems · | 6 upvotes · 302.3K views
Needs advice
on
BottleBottleFlaskFlask
and
NamekoNameko

Which is the best Python framework for microservices?

We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
BottleBottle

Bottle is much less bloated and fast. Its built-in templating system is one of the fastest as it compiles the templates in bytecode. Also Bottle has no depenencies, preventing dependency bloat.

See more
Saurav Pandit
Application Devloper at Bny Mellon · | 6 upvotes · 326.9K views

I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.

I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?

Here are some features I am looking for:

  • Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.

  • Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.

  • Support for swagger/ OpenAPI

  • Support for JSON Web Token

  • Support for test case coverage report

Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.

See more
Replies (1)
Recommends
on
FlaskFlask
at

For starters flask provides a beautiful and easy way to create REST APIs. Also its supported by excellent beginner docs as well as a very active community. Another good thing with Flask is its widely available list of plugins which allow you to build as you go. Its also good in performance and can scale to a quite decent level. However, if you are sure your project is going to be fairly big, it would be better to start with Django as it provides a lot of features out of the box and is extremely stable in performance. Both these frameworks have support for Swagger, JWT, Coverage Report although you have to install plugins for them. Deploying both of these are fairly simple and there is huge documentation available. Django has one of the best documentations I have come across. I hope I was able to answer your queries.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Flask
Pros of MEAN
  • 10
    For it flexibility
  • 9
    Flexibilty and easy to use
  • 7
    User friendly
  • 6
    Secured
  • 5
    Unopinionated
  • 2
    Secure
  • 2
    Customizable
  • 1
    Simple to use
  • 1
    Powerful
  • 1
    Rapid development
  • 1
    Flask
  • 1
    Easy to get started
  • 1
    Easy to develop and maintain applications
  • 1
    Easy to setup and get it going
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    Documentation
  • 1
    Beautiful code
  • 1
    Orm
  • 1
    Not JS
  • 1
    Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.
  • 1
    Easy to integrate
  • 1
    Speed
  • 1
    Get started quickly
  • 1
    Python
  • 1
    Minimal
  • 1
    Lightweight
  • 0
    Flexibilty
  • 0
    Well designed
  • 0
    Productive
  • 0
    Awesome
  • 0
    Open source
  • 0
    Expressive
  • 0
    Love it
  • 86
    Javascript
  • 62
    Easy
  • 58
    Nosql
  • 52
    Great community
  • 50
    Mongoose
  • 50
    Modularity
  • 48
    Open source
  • 37
    Organized
  • 32
    Simple
  • 31
    Boilerplate
  • 10
    AngularJs
  • 9
    CLI
  • 9
    It's simply awesome
  • 8
    Cutting edge tech
  • 7
    Passport
  • 6
    It's a great new exciting stack
  • 6
    Yeoman
  • 6
    Docs
  • 5
    Friendly & Fun
  • 4
    Great Flexibility ;)
  • 4
    The WordPress of javascript apps
  • 3
    Genius
  • 2
    Modular
  • 2
    Scalable
  • 2
    JavaScript only
  • 1
    Growing Community
  • 1
    It's fun and has great potential
  • 1
    Gulp
  • 1
    Because i can write everything using javascript
  • 1
    Fast
  • 0
    The best

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Flask
Cons of MEAN
  • 10
    Not JS
  • 7
    Context
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 1
    Don't has many module as in spring
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    759
    55.6K
    252
    18
    4K
    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Flask?

    Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.

    What is MEAN?

    MEAN (Mongo, Express, Angular, Node) is a boilerplate that provides a nice starting point for MongoDB, Node.js, Express, and AngularJS based applications. It is designed to give you a quick and organized way to start developing MEAN based web apps with useful modules like Mongoose and Passport pre-bundled and configured.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention Flask and MEAN as a desired skillset
    What companies use Flask?
    What companies use MEAN?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Flask?
    What tools integrate with MEAN?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Flask and MEAN?
    Django
    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
    Tornado
    By using non-blocking network I/O, Tornado can scale to tens of thousands of open connections, making it ideal for long polling, WebSockets, and other applications that require a long-lived connection to each user.
    ExpressJS
    Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.
    Node.js
    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    See all alternatives