Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Flask vs Spark Framework: What are the differences?
Introduction
Flask and Spark Framework are two popular web frameworks used for developing web applications. While both frameworks serve the purpose of building web applications, there are key differences that set them apart.
Routing and URL Mapping: Flask uses a flexible routing system that allows developers to define routes with specific URL patterns and associated view functions, providing a simple and intuitive way to map URLs to functionality. On the other hand, Spark Framework uses a concise and expressive syntax for route definition, making it easier to handle complex URL mappings and perform RESTful routing.
Scalability and Performance: Flask is known for its simplicity and lightweight nature, making it a good choice for small to medium-sized applications. However, it may face challenges when dealing with high load or large-scale applications, as it lacks the built-in scalability features of Spark Framework. Spark Framework, being built on top of Java and leveraging the power of the JVM, offers better performance and can handle high traffic and large datasets more efficiently.
Language Support: Flask is primarily used with Python, providing extensive support for the language and its ecosystem. It allows developers to take advantage of the rich libraries and tools available in Python. Spark Framework, on the other hand, is built on Java and provides support for other JVM-based languages like Scala and Kotlin. This makes it a preferred choice for developers who are already familiar with these languages or want to leverage the strengths of the JVM ecosystem.
Features and Functionality: Flask is a minimalist framework that provides only the essential features required for building web applications. It follows the "micro" philosophy, allowing developers to choose and integrate additional libraries as per their requirements. Spark Framework, on the other hand, comes bundled with a wide range of features and functionalities out of the box, including built-in support for handling HTTP requests, handling data serialization/deserialization, and managing session and authentication.
Community and Ecosystem: Flask has a large and active community of developers, with a vast ecosystem of plugins and extensions available to enhance its functionality. It is widely adopted and has a rich collection of resources, tutorials, and community support. Spark Framework also has an active community, but it is relatively smaller compared to Flask. However, being built on top of Java, Spark Framework can benefit from the vast Java ecosystem and the availability of various Java libraries and frameworks.
Learning Curve: Flask follows a simple and minimalist approach, making it relatively easy to learn and get started with. It has a gentle learning curve, especially for developers who are already familiar with Python. On the other hand, Spark Framework, being built on Java, may have a steeper learning curve, especially for developers who are new to Java or JVM-based languages. It requires understanding Java concepts and may involve more complex configurations and setups.
In summary, Flask provides a lightweight and flexible approach for building web applications primarily using Python, while Spark Framework offers better scalability, performance, and support for other JVM-based languages like Scala and Kotlin.
My journey to developing REST APIs started with Flask Restful, and I've found it to be enough for the needs of my project back then. Now that I've started investing more time on personal projects, I've yet to decide if I should move to use Django for writing REST APIs. I often see job posts looking for Python+Django developers, but it's usually for full-stack developers. I'm primarily interested in Data Engineering, so most of my web projects are back end.
Should I continue with what I know (Flask) or move on to Django?
If you want to be a Web developer with knowledge in another frontend and NoSql technology, maybe continue with Flask. However, if you want to create very fast solutions to grow up with a new business and merge these with data analysis and other tools, Django is the answer. Basically read more about the service architecture where you feel more comfortable, Microservice or Monolithic, but please will not married with any because they solve issues to different contexts.
Which is the best Python framework for microservices?
We are using Nameko for building microservices in Python. The things we really like are dependency injection and the ease with which one can expose endpoints via RPC over RabbitMQ. We are planning to try a tool that helps us write polyglot microservices and nameko is not super compatible with it. Also, we are a bit worried about the not so good community support from nameko and looking for a python alternate to write microservices.
Bottle is much less bloated and fast. Its built-in templating system is one of the fastest as it compiles the templates in bytecode. Also Bottle has no depenencies, preventing dependency bloat.
I have just started learning Python 3 weeks ago. I want to create a REST API using python. The API will be used to save form data in an Oracle database. The front end is using AngularJS 8 with Angular Material. In python, there are so many frameworks to develop REST APIs.
I am looking for some suggestions which REST framework to choose?
Here are some features I am looking for:
Easy integration and unit testing, like in Angular. We just want to run a command.
Code packaging, like in java maven project we can build and package. I am looking for something which I can push in as an artifact and deploy whole code as a package.
Support for swagger/ OpenAPI
Support for JSON Web Token
Support for test case coverage report
Framework can have features included or can be available by extension. Also, you can suggest a framework other than the ones I have mentioned.
For starters flask provides a beautiful and easy way to create REST APIs. Also its supported by excellent beginner docs as well as a very active community. Another good thing with Flask is its widely available list of plugins which allow you to build as you go. Its also good in performance and can scale to a quite decent level. However, if you are sure your project is going to be fairly big, it would be better to start with Django as it provides a lot of features out of the box and is extremely stable in performance. Both these frameworks have support for Swagger, JWT, Coverage Report although you have to install plugins for them. Deploying both of these are fairly simple and there is huge documentation available. Django has one of the best documentations I have come across. I hope I was able to answer your queries.
I developed Hexagon heavily inspired in these great tools because of the following reasons:
- Take full advantage of the Kotlin programming language without any strings attached to Java (as a language).
- I wanted to be able to replace the HTTP server library used with different adapters (Jetty, Netty, etc.) and though right now there is only one, more are coming.
- Have a complete tool to do full applications, though you can use other libraries, Hexagon comes with a dependency injection helper, settings loading from different sources and HTTP Client, so it comes with (batteries included).
Right now I'm using it for my pet projects, and I'm happy with it.
Pros of Flask
- For it flexibility10
- Flexibilty and easy to use9
- Flask8
- User friendly7
- Secured6
- Unopinionated5
- Secure2
- Customizable1
- Simple to use1
- Powerful1
- Rapid development1
- Beautiful code1
- Easy to develop and maintain applications1
- Easy to setup and get it going1
- Easy to use1
- Documentation1
- Python1
- Minimal1
- Lightweight1
- Easy to get started1
- Orm1
- Not JS1
- Perfect for small to large projects with superb docs.1
- Easy to integrate1
- Speed1
- Get started quickly1
- Open source0
- Well designed0
- Flexibilty0
- Productive0
- Awesome0
- Expressive0
- Love it0
Pros of Spark Framework
- Very easy to get up and running. Lovely API2
- Java1
- Native paralelization1
- Ideal for microservices1
- Fast1
- Easy1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Flask
- Not JS10
- Context7
- Not fast5
- Don't has many module as in spring1