Flutter vs Gluon: What are the differences?

Introduction

The decision to use Flutter or Gluon for developing cross-platform mobile applications relies on understanding the key differences between the two frameworks. Flutter is an open-source UI toolkit developed by Google, known for its rich set of pre-designed widgets, while Gluon is a framework specifically designed for creating mobile applications using JavaFX.

Language: Flutter uses Dart as its primary programming language, while Gluon relies on Java for development. This means that developers already familiar with Java may find Gluon easier to adopt, whereas those with experience in languages like JavaScript or TypeScript may prefer the Dart language used in Flutter.
Architecture: Flutter follows a reactive programming model, where the entire UI is rebuilt whenever there is a change in the state. On the other hand, Gluon utilizes a more traditional MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, allowing for more flexibility in separating the logic and presentation layers of the application.
Platform Support: Flutter is well-known for its extensive platform support, allowing developers to create apps for iOS, Android, web, desktop, and even embedded devices. Gluon, on the other hand, primarily focuses on targeting iOS and Android platforms, and its capabilities for other platforms are more limited.
Development Tools: Flutter provides a comprehensive set of command-line tools and a rich development environment called "Flutter SDK", which includes features like hot reload for instant code changes. Gluon, however, relies on standard Java development tools and the Gradle build system, making it a suitable choice for developers who prefer working with these established tools.
Widget Ecosystem: Flutter comes with an extensive collection of pre-built widgets, providing developers with a ready-to-use UI foundation. Gluon, while having a decent widget library, offers fewer options compared to Flutter. However, Gluon allows developers to leverage existing JavaFX components and libraries, expanding the possibilities of UI customization.
Community and Support: Flutter has gained significant popularity and has a large and active community of developers. This vibrant community provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and packages, making it easier for developers to find solutions to their problems. Gluon, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community, with limited resources and support available at present.

In summary, Flutter and Gluon differ in terms of programming language, architecture, platform support, development tools, widget ecosystem, and community support. Choosing between the two depends on factors such as previous programming language experience, target platforms, desired level of customization, and available community resources.

Flutter	Gluon
Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.	A new open source deep learning interface which allows developers to more easily and quickly build machine learning models, without compromising performance. Gluon provides a clear, concise API for defining machine learning models using a collection of pre-built, optimized neural network components.
Fast development - Flutter's "hot reload" helps you quickly and easily experiment, build UIs, add features, and fix bug faster. Experience sub-second reload times, without losing state, on emulators, simulators, and hardware for iOS and Android.;Expressive UIs - Delight your users with Flutter's built-in beautiful Material Design and Cupertino (iOS-flavor) widgets, rich motion APIs, smooth natural scrolling, and platform awareness.;Access native features and SDKs - Make your app come to life with platform APIs, 3rd party SDKs, and native code. Flutter lets you reuse your existing Java, Swift, and ObjC code, and access native features and SDKs on iOS and Android.	Simple, Easy-to-Understand Code: Gluon offers a full set of plug-and-play neural network building blocks, including predefined layers, optimizers, and initializers.;Flexible, Imperative Structure: Gluon does not require the neural network model to be rigidly defined, but rather brings the training algorithm and model closer together to provide flexibility in the development process.;Dynamic Graphs: Gluon enables developers to define neural network models that are dynamic, meaning they can be built on the fly, with any structure, and using any of Python’s native control flow.;High Performance: Gluon provides all of the above benefits without impacting the training speed that the underlying engine provides.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 173.7K	GitHub Stars 2.3K
GitHub Forks 29.4K	GitHub Forks 219
Stacks 17.4K	Stacks 29
Followers 16.8K	Followers 80
Votes 1.2K	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 147 Hot Reload 125 Cross platform 107 Performance 90 Backed by Google 74 Compiled into Native Code Cons 29 Need to learn Dart 11 Lack of community support 10 No 3D Graphics Engine Support 8 Graphics programming 6 Lack of friendly documentation	Pros 3 Good learning materials
Integrations
Android SDK Firebase Dart	No integrations available

Flutter vs Gluon

Overview

Flutter vs Gluon: What are the differences?

Introduction

🔥 Trending in Frameworks on StackShare

Advice on Flutter, Gluon

Detailed Comparison

What are some alternatives to Flutter, Gluon?

Ionic

React Native

Xamarin

NativeScript

Apache Cordova

Framework7

Qt

TensorFlow

PhoneGap

Expo

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase