StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Gin Gonic vs Phoenix Framework

Gin Gonic vs Phoenix Framework

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.0K
Votes678
GitHub Stars22.6K
Forks3.0K
Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic
Stacks393
Followers340
Votes16
GitHub Stars86.8K
Forks8.5K

Gin Gonic vs Phoenix Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here, we will discuss the key differences between Gin Gonic and Phoenix Framework.

  1. Community and Language: Gin Gonic is built using the Go programming language, which is known for its simplicity and performance. It has a growing community and offers a wide range of Go libraries. On the other hand, Phoenix Framework is built using the Elixir programming language, which is known for its reliability and scalability. It has a passionate community and benefits from the existing Elixir ecosystem.

  2. Concurrency Model: Gin Gonic follows a goroutine-per-request model, where each incoming request is handled by a separate goroutine. This allows for efficient handling of multiple requests concurrently. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, follows an actor-based concurrency model using the Erlang virtual machine. It leverages the lightweight processes (actors) to handle concurrent requests, providing fault-tolerant and highly scalable applications.

  3. Routing: Gin Gonic uses a straightforward and flexible routing engine that allows developers to define routes using different HTTP methods and patterns. It supports parameters and route groups, making it easy to organize and manage routes. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, uses a more convention-based approach to routing. It follows a resource-centric routing style, where routes are automatically generated based on the controller actions. This provides a standardized way to handle RESTful resources.

  4. Templating: Gin Gonic does not include a built-in templating engine. However, it provides integrations with popular Go templating libraries like HTML/template and Ace. Developers have the flexibility to choose the templating engine that suits their needs. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, includes a powerful templating system called EEx (Embedded Elixir) by default. EEx allows developers to embed Elixir code within HTML templates, making it easy to generate dynamic content.

  5. Database Access: Gin Gonic does not have an official ORM (Object-Relational Mapping) library. However, it provides integrations with popular Go ORMs like GORM and XORM. Developers have the freedom to choose the ORM that best fits their project requirements. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, includes its own ORM called Ecto. Ecto provides a simple and composable query interface, migrations, and support for multiple databases.

  6. Scalability Considerations: Gin Gonic is known for its lightweight and fast performance, making it suitable for building high-performance APIs. It is easy to horizontally scale Gin applications by adding more servers. Phoenix Framework, on the other hand, leverages the scalability of the Erlang virtual machine. It is designed to handle high traffic and massive concurrency out of the box, making it a good choice for building scalable real-time applications.

In summary, Gin Gonic, built using Go, offers a flexible routing engine, choice of templating and ORM libraries, and is suitable for high-performance APIs. Phoenix Framework, built using Elixir, follows a resource-centric routing style, includes a built-in templating system and ORM, and is designed for scalability and real-time applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework
Gin Gonic
Gin Gonic

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

It is an HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance. It is up to 40 times faster.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.6K
GitHub Stars
86.8K
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
8.5K
Stacks
1.0K
Stacks
393
Followers
1.0K
Followers
340
Votes
678
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 120
    High performance
  • 76
    Super fast
  • 70
    Rapid development
  • 62
    Open source
  • 60
    Erlang VM
Cons
  • 6
    No jobs
  • 5
    Very difficult
Pros
  • 11
    Hight performance
  • 5
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Low performance
  • 1
    No wildcard routing
Integrations
Elixir
Elixir
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Phoenix Framework, Gin Gonic?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase