GINO vs Sequelize: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here are the key differences between GINO and Sequelize.

1. Database Support: Sequelize supports multiple databases like Postgres, MySQL, SQLite, and MariaDB, while GINO focuses mainly on PostgreSQL, offering deeper integration and optimized performance for this specific database.

2. ORM vs. ODM: Sequelize is an Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) tool that maps objects to relational database tables, while GINO is an Object-Document Mapper (ODM) that focuses on mapping objects to PostgreSQL's JSONB data type.

3. Asynchronous Operations: Sequelize often requires the use of promises or callbacks for handling asynchronous operations, whereas GINO takes advantage of async/await syntax for more readable and efficient asynchronous code.

4. Performance: GINO tends to provide better overall performance for PostgreSQL due to its focused optimization for this database, while Sequelize may exhibit slightly lower performance when working with PostgreSQL compared to GINO.

5. Complexity: Sequelize is known for its more complex and feature-rich nature, offering a wide range of functionalities for database operations, whereas GINO aims for simplicity and ease of use with a narrower focus on PostgreSQL-specific features.

6. Community and Documentation: Sequelize has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation and resources available, while GINO, being a more specialized tool, may have comparatively fewer resources and community support.

In Summary, the key differences between GINO and Sequelize lies in database support, ORM vs. ODM nature, handling of asynchronous operations, performance optimization, complexity of features, and community and documentation support.