Git LFS vs git-fastclone

Overview

git-fastclone

Stacks2

Followers9

Votes0

GitHub Stars191

Forks29

Git LFS

Stacks14

Followers11

Votes0

GitHub Stars13.8K

Forks2.2K

Git LFS vs git-fastclone: What are the differences?

Git LFS and git-fastclone are two important tools in the Git ecosystem that have key differences. Git LFS is a Git extension that allows users to handle large files by storing them on a remote server while git-fastclone is a tool specifically designed to accelerate the cloning of Git repositories.

Purpose: Git LFS is designed to efficiently manage large files within Git repositories, allowing users to version control them without performance issues. On the other hand, git-fastclone is primarily focused on optimizing the process of cloning Git repositories, streamlining the initial setup and reducing the time taken to replicate a repository locally.
Implementation: Git LFS functions as a plugin to Git, extending its capabilities to handle large files by storing them externally, while git-fastclone is a standalone tool that enhances the Git cloning process by employing various optimization techniques such as parallel cloning and smart transfer protocols.
File Handling: Git LFS is specifically tailored for large file management, providing features like file locking, versioning, and efficient storage mechanisms, whereas git-fastclone does not directly handle file storage but instead focuses on improving the cloning efficiency of Git repositories.
Dependencies: Git LFS requires users to set up and configure a separate Git LFS server to store large files, adding another layer of complexity to the Git workflow, whereas git-fastclone does not have any additional dependencies and can be used independently to speed up repository cloning operations.
Usage Scenarios: Git LFS is commonly used in scenarios where large binary files need to be version controlled within a Git repository, such as multimedia assets or datasets, while git-fastclone is utilized in situations where quick replication of Git repositories is essential, especially in large-scale development environments.

In Summary, Git LFS focuses on managing large files within Git repositories while git-fastclone is focused on accelerating the cloning process of Git repositories, providing optimization for repository replication.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

git-fastclone	Git LFS
It creates a reference repo with git clone --mirror in /var/tmp/git-fastclone/reference for each repository and git submodule linked in the main repo. You can control where it puts these by changing the REFERENCE_REPO_DIR environment variable.	It replaces large files such as audio samples, videos, datasets, and graphics with text pointers inside Git, while storing the file contents on a remote server like GitHub.com or GitHub Enterprise.
Create a reference repo for every repository and their submodules; Updates mirrors from origin and clones into target directory	Large file versioning; More repository space; Faster cloning and fetching; Same Git workflow; Same access controls and permissions
Statistics
GitHub Stars 191	GitHub Stars 13.8K
GitHub Forks 29	GitHub Forks 2.2K
Stacks 2	Stacks 14
Followers 9	Followers 11
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
GitHub	Git

What are some alternatives to git-fastclone, Git LFS?

Diff So Fancy

diff-so-fancy builds on the good-lookin' output of git contrib's diff-highlight to upgrade your diffs' appearances.

TortoiseGit

It is a Git revision control client, implemented as a Windows shell extension and based on TortoiseSVN. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License.

GitUI

It is a blazing fast terminal-UI for git written in Rust. You can inspect, commit, and amend changes. It has context-based help (no need to memorize tons of hot-keys).

pre-commit by Yelp

If one of your developers doesn’t have node installed but modifies a JavaScript file, pre-commit automatically handles downloading and building node to run jshint without root. Pre-commit is a multi-language package manager for pre-commit hooks. You specify a list of hooks you want and pre-commit manages the installation and execution of any hook written in any language before every commit. pre-commit is specifically designed to not require root access.

ungit

Clean and intuitive UI that makes it easy to understand git.

rebase-editor

Simple terminal based sequence editor for git interactive rebase. Written in Node.js, published to npm, uses terminal-kit.

hub

hub is a command line tool that wraps git in order to extend it with extra features and commands that make working with GitHub easier.

Check It Out

Check It Out lets you interactively see and choose what branch you want to check out without the hassle of trying to type out a long or confusing branch name. Checking out branches just got even simpler!

hug-scm

A humane, intuitive interface for Git and other version control systems. Hug transforms complex and forgettable Git commands into a simple, predictable language that feels natural to use, keeping you focused on your code, not on wrestling with version control.

pre-commit

pre-commit checks your code for errors before you commit it. pre-commit is configurable.

Related Comparisons

Git LFS vs git-fastclone: What are the differences?

Purpose: Git LFS is designed to efficiently manage large files within Git repositories, allowing users to version control them without performance issues. On the other hand, git-fastclone is primarily focused on optimizing the process of cloning Git repositories, streamlining the initial setup and reducing the time taken to replicate a repository locally.
Implementation: Git LFS functions as a plugin to Git, extending its capabilities to handle large files by storing them externally, while git-fastclone is a standalone tool that enhances the Git cloning process by employing various optimization techniques such as parallel cloning and smart transfer protocols.
File Handling: Git LFS is specifically tailored for large file management, providing features like file locking, versioning, and efficient storage mechanisms, whereas git-fastclone does not directly handle file storage but instead focuses on improving the cloning efficiency of Git repositories.
Dependencies: Git LFS requires users to set up and configure a separate Git LFS server to store large files, adding another layer of complexity to the Git workflow, whereas git-fastclone does not have any additional dependencies and can be used independently to speed up repository cloning operations.
Usage Scenarios: Git LFS is commonly used in scenarios where large binary files need to be version controlled within a Git repository, such as multimedia assets or datasets, while git-fastclone is utilized in situations where quick replication of Git repositories is essential, especially in large-scale development environments.

Git LFS vs git-fastclone

Overview