Git LFS vs go-git

Overview

go-git

Stacks10

Followers15

Votes0

GitHub Stars4.9K

Forks535

Git LFS

Stacks14

Followers11

Votes0

GitHub Stars13.8K

Forks2.2K

Git LFS vs go-git: What are the differences?

Git LFS vs Go-Git

Git LFS and go-git are two different tools used in the Git ecosystem, but they have some key differences that distinguish them. The following are six specific differences between Git LFS and go-git:

Purpose: Git LFS, which stands for Git Large File Storage, is designed to handle large files in a Git repository by replacing them with text pointers in the repository and storing the actual file content in a separate storage area. On the other hand, go-git is a pure Go implementation of Git, providing a set of libraries to create, read, update, and delete Git repositories and perform various Git operations programmatically.
Usability: Git LFS extends Git with additional commands and functionality specific to handling large files, making it easier to work with such files in a Git repository. Go-git, on the contrary, is a lower-level library that requires more code to perform similar operations and lacks some high-level abstractions provided by Git LFS.
Integration: Git LFS requires the installation of Git LFS command-line client and its associated server software to work with large files, adding an extra layer of complexity to the development environment. Go-git, being a Go library, can be integrated directly into a Go application without any need for additional installations or dependencies.
Supported Git Operations: Git LFS focuses primarily on managing large file storage and tracking, providing limited support for other Git operations. In contrast, go-git provides a comprehensive set of APIs for performing various Git operations, including creating and cloning repositories, branching and merging, committing and pushing changes, etc.
Performance: Git LFS is optimized for handling large files efficiently by storing them separately and replacing them with text pointers, resulting in faster clone and checkout times. On the other hand, go-git's performance depends on the specific implementation and usage scenario, but it generally provides good performance for most common Git operations.
Community and Support: Git LFS is backed by a larger community and has more widespread adoption, making it easier to find resources, documentation, and community support. Go-git, being a relatively newer project, may have a smaller community and limited availability of resources and support.

In summary, Git LFS and go-git have different purposes, levels of usability, integrations, supported operations, performance characteristics, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

go-git	Git LFS
A low level and highly extensible git client library for reading repositories from git servers. It is written in Go from scratch, without any C dependencies.	It replaces large files such as audio samples, videos, datasets, and graphics with text pointers inside Git, while storing the file contents on a remote server like GitHub.com or GitHub Enterprise.
-	Large file versioning; More repository space; Faster cloning and fetching; Same Git workflow; Same access controls and permissions
Statistics
GitHub Stars 4.9K	GitHub Stars 13.8K
GitHub Forks 535	GitHub Forks 2.2K
Stacks 10	Stacks 14
Followers 15	Followers 11
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
Git	Git

What are some alternatives to go-git, Git LFS?

Diff So Fancy

diff-so-fancy builds on the good-lookin' output of git contrib's diff-highlight to upgrade your diffs' appearances.

TortoiseGit

It is a Git revision control client, implemented as a Windows shell extension and based on TortoiseSVN. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License.

GitUI

It is a blazing fast terminal-UI for git written in Rust. You can inspect, commit, and amend changes. It has context-based help (no need to memorize tons of hot-keys).

pre-commit by Yelp

If one of your developers doesn’t have node installed but modifies a JavaScript file, pre-commit automatically handles downloading and building node to run jshint without root. Pre-commit is a multi-language package manager for pre-commit hooks. You specify a list of hooks you want and pre-commit manages the installation and execution of any hook written in any language before every commit. pre-commit is specifically designed to not require root access.

ungit

Clean and intuitive UI that makes it easy to understand git.

rebase-editor

Simple terminal based sequence editor for git interactive rebase. Written in Node.js, published to npm, uses terminal-kit.

hub

hub is a command line tool that wraps git in order to extend it with extra features and commands that make working with GitHub easier.

Check It Out

Check It Out lets you interactively see and choose what branch you want to check out without the hassle of trying to type out a long or confusing branch name. Checking out branches just got even simpler!

hug-scm

A humane, intuitive interface for Git and other version control systems. Hug transforms complex and forgettable Git commands into a simple, predictable language that feels natural to use, keeping you focused on your code, not on wrestling with version control.

pre-commit

pre-commit checks your code for errors before you commit it. pre-commit is configurable.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana

Git LFS vs go-git: What are the differences?

Git LFS vs Go-Git

Git LFS and go-git are two different tools used in the Git ecosystem, but they have some key differences that distinguish them. The following are six specific differences between Git LFS and go-git:

Purpose: Git LFS, which stands for Git Large File Storage, is designed to handle large files in a Git repository by replacing them with text pointers in the repository and storing the actual file content in a separate storage area. On the other hand, go-git is a pure Go implementation of Git, providing a set of libraries to create, read, update, and delete Git repositories and perform various Git operations programmatically.
Usability: Git LFS extends Git with additional commands and functionality specific to handling large files, making it easier to work with such files in a Git repository. Go-git, on the contrary, is a lower-level library that requires more code to perform similar operations and lacks some high-level abstractions provided by Git LFS.
Integration: Git LFS requires the installation of Git LFS command-line client and its associated server software to work with large files, adding an extra layer of complexity to the development environment. Go-git, being a Go library, can be integrated directly into a Go application without any need for additional installations or dependencies.
Supported Git Operations: Git LFS focuses primarily on managing large file storage and tracking, providing limited support for other Git operations. In contrast, go-git provides a comprehensive set of APIs for performing various Git operations, including creating and cloning repositories, branching and merging, committing and pushing changes, etc.
Performance: Git LFS is optimized for handling large files efficiently by storing them separately and replacing them with text pointers, resulting in faster clone and checkout times. On the other hand, go-git's performance depends on the specific implementation and usage scenario, but it generally provides good performance for most common Git operations.
Community and Support: Git LFS is backed by a larger community and has more widespread adoption, making it easier to find resources, documentation, and community support. Go-git, being a relatively newer project, may have a smaller community and limited availability of resources and support.

In summary, Git LFS and go-git have different purposes, levels of usability, integrations, supported operations, performance characteristics, and community support.