StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Git Tools
  5. GVFS vs Git LFS

GVFS vs Git LFS

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GVFS
GVFS
Stacks19
Followers38
Votes0
Git LFS
Git LFS
Stacks14
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.8K
Forks2.2K

GVFS vs Git LFS: What are the differences?

Introduction

This article aims to outline the key differences between GVFS and Git LFS. Both GVFS (Git Virtual File System) and Git LFS (Large File Storage) are tools designed to handle large files within Git repositories, but they have some significant differences.

  1. Handling of large files: Git LFS is primarily designed to handle large files by storing them outside the Git repository and replacing them with text pointers. This helps in reducing the overall repository size and improving performance. On the other hand, GVFS uses a virtual file system to avoid downloading the entire repository, allowing users to work with large repositories without downloading all the files.

  2. Core functionality: Git LFS extends Git's functionality by providing a way to manage large files efficiently. It provides support for actions like pushing, pulling, and cloning repositories. GVFS, on the other hand, aims to tackle the limitations of the Git client for Windows when dealing with large repositories, providing a virtualized file system.

  3. Native support: Git LFS requires the installation of a separate client and an additional configuration step in each repository to use it effectively. GVFS, on the other hand, is built directly into the Git client for Windows, eliminating the need for separate installations and configurations.

  4. Storage location: Git LFS stores large files in a separate location (either a local disk or a remote storage provider) and replaces them with text pointers within the Git repository. GVFS, on the other hand, does not store the entire repository locally but uses a virtual file system to provide access to required files when needed.

  5. Repository accessibility: Git LFS requires the entire repository to be cloned locally to access and work with individual files. This can be time-consuming for large repositories. GVFS allows users to work with large repositories without the need to clone the entire repository, providing faster access to specific files.

  6. Integration with other Git tools: Git LFS integrates well with existing Git tools and workflows, providing seamless integration for managing large files. On the other hand, GVFS is designed to work specifically with the Git client for Windows, offering improved performance when dealing with large repositories on Windows operating systems.

In summary, Git LFS and GVFS both address the challenge of handling large files within Git repositories, but they differ in their approach and core functionality. Git LFS focuses on storing files outside the repository and replacing them with text pointers, while GVFS uses a virtual file system to enhance performance and avoid downloading the entire repository.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GVFS
GVFS
Git LFS
Git LFS

GVFS virtualizes the file system beneath your git repo so that git and all tools see a fully hydrated repo, but GVFS only downloads objects as they are needed. GVFS also manages git's sparse-checkout to ensure that git operations like status, checkout, etc., can be as quick as possible.

It replaces large files such as audio samples, videos, datasets, and graphics with text pointers inside Git, while storing the file contents on a remote server like GitHub.com or GitHub Enterprise.

-
Large file versioning; More repository space; Faster cloning and fetching; Same Git workflow; Same access controls and permissions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
13.8K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.2K
Stacks
19
Stacks
14
Followers
38
Followers
11
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Git
Git
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to GVFS, Git LFS?

Diff So Fancy

Diff So Fancy

diff-so-fancy builds on the good-lookin' output of git contrib's diff-highlight to upgrade your diffs' appearances.

TortoiseGit

TortoiseGit

It is a Git revision control client, implemented as a Windows shell extension and based on TortoiseSVN. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License.

GitUI

GitUI

It is a blazing fast terminal-UI for git written in Rust. You can inspect, commit, and amend changes. It has context-based help (no need to memorize tons of hot-keys).

pre-commit by Yelp

pre-commit by Yelp

If one of your developers doesn’t have node installed but modifies a JavaScript file, pre-commit automatically handles downloading and building node to run jshint without root. Pre-commit is a multi-language package manager for pre-commit hooks. You specify a list of hooks you want and pre-commit manages the installation and execution of any hook written in any language before every commit. pre-commit is specifically designed to not require root access.

ungit

ungit

Clean and intuitive UI that makes it easy to understand git.

rebase-editor

rebase-editor

Simple terminal based sequence editor for git interactive rebase. Written in Node.js, published to npm, uses terminal-kit.

hub

hub

hub is a command line tool that wraps git in order to extend it with extra features and commands that make working with GitHub easier.

Check It Out

Check It Out

Check It Out lets you interactively see and choose what branch you want to check out without the hassle of trying to type out a long or confusing branch name. Checking out branches just got even simpler!

hug-scm

hug-scm

A humane, intuitive interface for Git and other version control systems. Hug transforms complex and forgettable Git commands into a simple, predictable language that feels natural to use, keeping you focused on your code, not on wrestling with version control.

pre-commit

pre-commit

pre-commit checks your code for errors before you commit it. pre-commit is configurable.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana