StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Version Control
  4. Git Tools
  5. Git LFS vs lazygit

Git LFS vs lazygit

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

lazygit
lazygit
Stacks12
Followers10
Votes0
GitHub Stars67.2K
Forks2.3K
Git LFS
Git LFS
Stacks14
Followers11
Votes0
GitHub Stars13.8K
Forks2.2K

Git LFS vs lazygit: What are the differences?

# Git LFS vs lazygit

**Introduction:** When considering version control and simplifying workflows in Git, Git LFS and lazygit are two tools that provide different functionalities. Understanding the key differences between Git LFS and lazygit can help users choose the right tool for their specific needs.

1. **Functionality**: Git LFS, or Git Large File Storage, is a Git extension that deals with large files by storing them outside the Git repository while lazygit is a simple terminal UI for Git commands, allowing for easier navigation and visualization of Git repositories.
2. **Purpose**: Git LFS is specifically designed for handling large files efficiently in a Git repository, making it suitable for projects that involve large assets such as multimedia files, whereas lazygit focuses on providing a user-friendly interface for managing regular Git tasks like staging, committing, and branching.
3. **Workflow Integration**: Git LFS seamlessly integrates into Git workflows by providing tools to track, version, and store large files separately, ensuring faster cloning and fetching times, while lazygit enhances the user experience by providing a visual representation of the Git repository's status, helping users visualize changes and branches easily.
4. **Community Support**: Git LFS is maintained by GitHub and has a supportive community that actively contributes to its development and improvement, offering robust documentation and troubleshooting resources, whereas lazygit is an open-source project with contributors from around the world, providing continuous updates and bug fixes to enhance the tool's usability.
5. **Dependencies**: Git LFS requires installation and configuration to work with Git repositories, whereas lazygit is a standalone tool that can be easily installed and launched without any additional setup, making it a convenient choice for users looking for a quick and simple Git interface.
6. **User Experience**: Git LFS focuses on optimizing Git performance when dealing with large files, ensuring version control efficiency and storage management, while lazygit prioritizes ease of use and visual representation, streamlining common Git operations for a more intuitive user experience.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Git LFS and lazygit can help users choose the right tool based on their specific requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

lazygit
lazygit
Git LFS
Git LFS

It is a simple terminal UI for git commands, written in Go with the gocui library.

It replaces large files such as audio samples, videos, datasets, and graphics with text pointers inside Git, while storing the file contents on a remote server like GitHub.com or GitHub Enterprise.

Adding files easily; Resolving merge conflicts; Easily check out recent branches; Scroll through logs/diffs of branches/commits/stash; Quick pushing/pulling; Squash down and rename commits
Large file versioning; More repository space; Faster cloning and fetching; Same Git workflow; Same access controls and permissions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
67.2K
GitHub Stars
13.8K
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
2.2K
Stacks
12
Stacks
14
Followers
10
Followers
11
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Git
Git
Git
Git

What are some alternatives to lazygit, Git LFS?

Diff So Fancy

Diff So Fancy

diff-so-fancy builds on the good-lookin' output of git contrib's diff-highlight to upgrade your diffs' appearances.

TortoiseGit

TortoiseGit

It is a Git revision control client, implemented as a Windows shell extension and based on TortoiseSVN. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License.

GitUI

GitUI

It is a blazing fast terminal-UI for git written in Rust. You can inspect, commit, and amend changes. It has context-based help (no need to memorize tons of hot-keys).

pre-commit by Yelp

pre-commit by Yelp

If one of your developers doesn’t have node installed but modifies a JavaScript file, pre-commit automatically handles downloading and building node to run jshint without root. Pre-commit is a multi-language package manager for pre-commit hooks. You specify a list of hooks you want and pre-commit manages the installation and execution of any hook written in any language before every commit. pre-commit is specifically designed to not require root access.

ungit

ungit

Clean and intuitive UI that makes it easy to understand git.

rebase-editor

rebase-editor

Simple terminal based sequence editor for git interactive rebase. Written in Node.js, published to npm, uses terminal-kit.

hub

hub

hub is a command line tool that wraps git in order to extend it with extra features and commands that make working with GitHub easier.

Check It Out

Check It Out

Check It Out lets you interactively see and choose what branch you want to check out without the hassle of trying to type out a long or confusing branch name. Checking out branches just got even simpler!

hug-scm

hug-scm

A humane, intuitive interface for Git and other version control systems. Hug transforms complex and forgettable Git commands into a simple, predictable language that feels natural to use, keeping you focused on your code, not on wrestling with version control.

pre-commit

pre-commit

pre-commit checks your code for errors before you commit it. pre-commit is configurable.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana