Github Native vs LGTM

Overview

LGTM

Stacks11

Followers26

Votes0

GitHub Stars989

Forks125

Github Native

Stacks5

Followers11

Votes0

GitHub Stars96

Forks16

Github Native vs LGTM: What are the differences?

Integration with GitHub Issues and Pull Requests: GitHub Native allows for seamless integration with GitHub Issues and Pull Requests, making it easier for developers to track and manage code changes. On the other hand, LGTM does not have the same level of integration with GitHub, and developers may need to use additional tools to manage Issues and PRs.
Code Review Capabilities: LGTM offers advanced code review capabilities, including automated code analysis and security scanning, which can help identify potential issues in the codebase. While GitHub Native also supports code review, LGTM provides more extensive analysis features to improve code quality and security.
Support for Multiple Languages and Platforms: LGTM supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, making it suitable for diverse development environments. GitHub Native, while versatile, may have limitations in terms of language and platform support, potentially restricting its use in certain projects.
Community and Documentation: The LGTM platform has a strong community of developers and extensive documentation, making it easier for users to find support and resources. In contrast, GitHub Native may have limited community support and documentation, which could impact the user experience for developers seeking assistance.
Customization and Configuration Options: LGTM provides more customization and configuration options for users to tailor the tool to their specific needs and preferences. This flexibility allows developers to create a workflow that best suits their project requirements, while GitHub Native may have fewer customization options available.
Enterprise Features and Support: LGTM offers enterprise features, such as advanced security controls and enhanced support options, making it a preferred choice for businesses with specific security and compliance requirements. GitHub Native may not offer the same level of enterprise-focused features, potentially limiting its suitability for larger organizations.

In Summary, GitHub Native and LGTM differ in their integration with GitHub, code review capabilities, language support, community resources, customization options, and enterprise features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

LGTM	Github Native
LGTM is a simple pull request approval system using GitHub protected branches and maintainers files. Pull requests are locked and cannot be merged until the minimum number of approvals are received. Project maintainers can indicate their approval by commenting on the pull request and including LGTM (looks good to me) in their approval text.	mobile github client built with react-native
Unparalleled security analysis; Automated code review; Free for open source; Deep semantic code search	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 989	GitHub Stars 96
GitHub Forks 125	GitHub Forks 16
Stacks 11	Stacks 5
Followers 26	Followers 11
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
GitHub	GitHub

What are some alternatives to LGTM, Github Native?

Remergr.io

Keep your pull requests automatically up-to-date and resolve your pull requests' conflicts directly from GitHub's UI. Save hundreds of hours you spend resolving conflicts by keeping always your pull requests automatically up-to-date to reduce the chance of conflicts. If conflicts are found, you can straightforwardly resolve them on GitHub's UI with a click of a button.

Astral

Astral pulls down all of your starred repositories on GitHub and allows you to organize them using one or more tags.

TravisBuddy

TravisBuddy is a cloud service that creates comments in failed pull requests and tell the author what went wrong and what they can do to fix it.

Insight.io for Github

Improve GitHub code browsing experience by decorating file page with x-ref. Insight.io understands the semantics of a lot of Java, Scala, C++/C, Ruby, Python, PHP repositories at github.

Octokit

It is a client library targeting .NET 4.5 and above that provides an easy way to interact with the GitHub API.

Release

When run, this command line interface automatically generates a new GitHub Release and populates it with the changes (commits) made since the last release.

GitHub Desktop

It is an open-source multi-platform GUI Git client designed for working with GitHub repositories. Focus on what matters instead of fighting with Git. Whether you're new to Git or a seasoned user, it simplifies your development workflow.

GitHub CLI

It is a free and open-source command-line for GitHub. It provides GitHub's graphical features like pull requests, issues, releases, etc. into a terminal. So, anyone can perform the whole GitHub operation from a terminal or with a script.

Datree

Prevent Kubernetes misconfigurations from reaching production with Datree’s automated policy checks for your pipeline. The open-source CLI tool empowers engineers to write more stable configurations, so they can actually sleep at night.

GitHub Polls

These polls work by pasting individual markdown SVG images into your issue, each wrapped with a link that tracks a vote. A single vote per IP is allowed for a given poll, which are stored in DynamoDB.

Related Comparisons

Github Native vs LGTM: What are the differences?

Integration with GitHub Issues and Pull Requests: GitHub Native allows for seamless integration with GitHub Issues and Pull Requests, making it easier for developers to track and manage code changes. On the other hand, LGTM does not have the same level of integration with GitHub, and developers may need to use additional tools to manage Issues and PRs.
Code Review Capabilities: LGTM offers advanced code review capabilities, including automated code analysis and security scanning, which can help identify potential issues in the codebase. While GitHub Native also supports code review, LGTM provides more extensive analysis features to improve code quality and security.
Support for Multiple Languages and Platforms: LGTM supports a wide range of programming languages and platforms, making it suitable for diverse development environments. GitHub Native, while versatile, may have limitations in terms of language and platform support, potentially restricting its use in certain projects.
Community and Documentation: The LGTM platform has a strong community of developers and extensive documentation, making it easier for users to find support and resources. In contrast, GitHub Native may have limited community support and documentation, which could impact the user experience for developers seeking assistance.
Customization and Configuration Options: LGTM provides more customization and configuration options for users to tailor the tool to their specific needs and preferences. This flexibility allows developers to create a workflow that best suits their project requirements, while GitHub Native may have fewer customization options available.
Enterprise Features and Support: LGTM offers enterprise features, such as advanced security controls and enhanced support options, making it a preferred choice for businesses with specific security and compliance requirements. GitHub Native may not offer the same level of enterprise-focused features, potentially limiting its suitability for larger organizations.

In Summary, GitHub Native and LGTM differ in their integration with GitHub, code review capabilities, language support, community resources, customization options, and enterprise features.

Github Native vs LGTM

Overview