Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GraphQL vs TypeORM: What are the differences?
Introduction
This document outlines the key differences between GraphQL and TypeORM. GraphQL is a query language and runtime for APIs, whereas TypeORM is an Object Relational Mapping (ORM) library for TypeScript and JavaScript.
1. Query Language vs ORM Library: The first key difference between GraphQL and TypeORM is their purpose and functionality. GraphQL is primarily a query language that allows clients to efficiently and flexibly retrieve data from an API. It provides a unified interface to retrieve exactly the data that the client requests. On the other hand, TypeORM is an ORM library that facilitates the mapping of database objects to TypeScript or JavaScript classes. It allows developers to interact with databases using object-oriented programming techniques.
2. Data Retrieval and Manipulation: Another difference is the way data is retrieved and manipulated. With GraphQL, clients can specify the exact data they need by defining a query, and the server responds with only the requested data, eliminating over-fetching and under-fetching issues. In contrast, TypeORM provides APIs and methods for developers to perform various common database operations such as querying, inserting, updating, and deleting records.
3. Declarative vs Imperative: GraphQL is a declarative language, meaning that clients can specify the desired data structure and shape without needing to explicitly define the steps or commands to retrieve it. The server handles the execution of the query and returns the requested data. TypeORM, on the other hand, follows an imperative approach, where developers write explicit code to interact with the database, specifying the actions to be performed step by step.
4. Server-Centric vs Client-Centric: GraphQL is a server-centric technology, with the server responsible for processing and executing the client's queries. The server is responsible for resolving fields and relationships, aggregating data from various sources, and returning the result to the client. TypeORM, on the other hand, is a client-centric technology, where developers primarily use the library on the client-side to interact with databases. It provides a set of APIs specifically designed for querying and manipulating data on the client-side.
5. Execution Control: GraphQL provides fine-grained control over the execution of queries through its resolver functions. Developers can define resolver functions to handle specific fields and relationships, allowing for complex computations, data transformations, and business logic to be performed during the query execution. TypeORM, on the other hand, provides a more limited level of execution control, as the library primarily focuses on mapping database objects to JavaScript or TypeScript classes and executing predefined CRUD operations.
6. Language Agnostic vs TypeScript/JavaScript: GraphQL is designed to be language-agnostic, meaning it can be used with any programming language. This allows for a wide range of client implementations and backend server integrations. In contrast, TypeORM is specifically designed for TypeScript and JavaScript applications. It provides strong typing, decorators, and other language-specific features that enhance the development experience for projects using these languages.
In summary, GraphQL is a query language for APIs, providing a flexible and efficient way for clients to retrieve data from servers. TypeORM, on the other hand, is an Object Relational Mapping library that maps database objects to TypeScript or JavaScript classes, aiming to simplify database interactions for developers on the client-side.
Pros of GraphQL
- Schemas defined by the requests made by the user75
- Will replace RESTful interfaces63
- The future of API's62
- The future of databases49
- Get many resources in a single request12
- Self-documenting12
- Ask for what you need, get exactly that6
- Query Language6
- Fetch different resources in one request3
- Type system3
- Evolve your API without versions3
- Ease of client creation2
- GraphiQL2
- Easy setup2
- "Open" document1
- Fast prototyping1
- Supports subscription1
- Standard1
- Good for apps that query at build time. (SSR/Gatsby)1
- 1. Describe your data1
- Better versioning1
- Backed by Facebook1
- Easy to learn1
Pros of TypeORM
- Typescript30
- Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser12
- Easy setup9
- Cons of TypeORM9
- Promise Based7
- Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron p7
- Support MySQL & MariaDB, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Sqlite6
- Support MongoDB1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GraphQL
- Hard to migrate from GraphQL to another technology4
- More code to type.4
- Takes longer to build compared to schemaless.2
- No support for caching1
- All the pros sound like NFT pitches1
- No support for streaming1
- Works just like any other API at runtime1
- N+1 fetch problem1
- No built in security1
Cons of TypeORM
- Completely abandoned by its creator5
- Too complex for what it does3
- Doesn't really support native javascript2
- Not proper/real type safety1
- Cannot use query on any relation1