Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
GWT vs jQuery: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this Markdown code, I will provide the key differences between GWT and jQuery, focusing on six specific points. GWT (Google Web Toolkit) and jQuery are both popular web development frameworks with distinct features and purposes. Understanding their differences can help developers choose the most suitable framework for their projects.
Execution Environment: GWT allows developers to write web applications in Java, which can be translated into JavaScript for execution in the client's browser. On the other hand, jQuery is a JavaScript library that simplifies HTML document traversal, event handling, and animation for rapid web development.
Language and Syntax: GWT primarily uses Java as its programming language, providing object-oriented features and static typing. In contrast, jQuery is written entirely in JavaScript, utilizing its dynamic nature and extensive built-in functions.
Purpose and Focus: GWT is designed to enable developers to build complex, high-performance web applications with a focus on scalability and maintainability. jQuery, however, is primarily geared towards simplifying and enhancing client-side scripting, making it easier to manipulate HTML, handle events, and create interactive user experiences.
Abstraction Level: GWT operates at a higher abstraction level by allowing developers to write code in Java and abstracting away the complexities of JavaScript implementation details. jQuery, being a JavaScript library, provides a lower-level abstraction and requires a deeper understanding of JavaScript to fully leverage its capabilities.
Cross-Browser Compatibility: GWT automatically handles many browser compatibility issues by generating optimized JavaScript code specific to each browser. jQuery also helps address cross-browser compatibility concerns, but it requires developers to write code that adheres to the standards and best practices supported by different browsers.
Community and Ecosystem: GWT has a well-established community and a range of available plugins, libraries, and frameworks that support its development ecosystem. jQuery, with its large user base, offers an extensive collection of plugins and resources that can enhance the development process.
In summary, GWT is a Java-based framework that emphasizes scalability and maintainability, while jQuery is a JavaScript library focused on simplifying client-side scripting and enhancing user experiences. GWT operates at a higher level of abstraction and automatically handles cross-browser compatibility, while jQuery requires a deeper understanding of JavaScript and offers a larger community and range of resources.
The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!
What do you think?
I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?
When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.
I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.
Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.
I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.
Pros of GWT
Pros of jQuery
- Cross-browser1.3K
- Dom manipulation957
- Power809
- Open source660
- Plugins610
- Easy459
- Popular395
- Feature-rich350
- Html5281
- Light weight227
- Simple93
- Great community84
- CSS3 Compliant79
- Mobile friendly69
- Fast67
- Intuitive43
- Swiss Army knife for webdev42
- Huge Community35
- Easy to learn11
- Clean code4
- Because of Ajax request :)3
- Powerful2
- Nice2
- Just awesome2
- Used everywhere2
- Improves productivity1
- Javascript1
- Easy Setup1
- Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup1
- It Just Works1
- Industry acceptance1
- Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS1
- Widely Used1
- I love jQuery1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of GWT
Cons of jQuery
- Large size6
- Sometimes inconsistent API5
- Encourages DOM as primary data source5
- Live events is overly complex feature2
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is GWT?
What is jQuery?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use GWT?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with GWT?
What tools integrate with jQuery?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+43
+26+29